R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782
| Judge | Poelman |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 782 |
| Docket Number | 180547424Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 09 October 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...accused’s luggage and ticket); Channa , supra note 131 at paras 16, 28 (the police needed to deal with the accused’s dog); R v Aquila , 2019 ABQB 782 at para 191 (the police needed to deal with the accused’s infant and dog). © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. 380 Det......
-
Table of Cases
...390 Appleby , R v , 2007 NLTD 52 .................................................. 293 Aquila , R v , 2019 ABQB 782 ................................................... 379 Arana , R v , [2022] OJ No 5020 (QL) (SC) ................................... 377, 386 Armaly v Canada (Parole Service......
-
R v Malthouse, 2022 ABPC 1
...the cases and principles listed above are not satisfied. [Emphasis added]. [36] In R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782 at para 81, Poelman J held: There is a large body of law on when police are constitutionally justified to detain a person, short of conducti......
-
R v Ward, 2022 ABPC 4
...Criminal Code. [8] Mr. Justice Poelman, in the decision of R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782, stated as [87] Police arrest powers are codified in the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
R v Malthouse, 2022 ABPC 1
...the cases and principles listed above are not satisfied. [Emphasis added]. [36] In R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782 at para 81, Poelman J held: There is a large body of law on when police are constitutionally justified to detain a person, short of conducti......
-
R v Ward, 2022 ABPC 4
...Criminal Code. [8] Mr. Justice Poelman, in the decision of R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782, stated as [87] Police arrest powers are codified in the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1......
-
R v El-Majzoub,
...contrary to section 5(2) of the CDSA, and to preserve that evidence from remote wiping. [123] In R v Aquila, 2019 ABQB 782, at para 95 the Court Searches that are truly incidental to arrest will usually occur within a reasonable time after arrest. A substantial delay......
2 books & journal articles
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...accused’s luggage and ticket); Channa , supra note 131 at paras 16, 28 (the police needed to deal with the accused’s dog); R v Aquila , 2019 ABQB 782 at para 191 (the police needed to deal with the accused’s infant and dog). © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. 380 Det......
-
Table of Cases
...390 Appleby , R v , 2007 NLTD 52 .................................................. 293 Aquila , R v , 2019 ABQB 782 ................................................... 379 Arana , R v , [2022] OJ No 5020 (QL) (SC) ................................... 377, 386 Armaly v Canada (Parole Service......