R. v. Aragon
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Hourigan,Paciocco,Strathy |
| Citation | 2022 ONCA 244 |
| Docket Number | C66426 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 24 March 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
24 practice notes
-
R v Patrick
...should not decide this based on the paper record that was filed. The defence relies on the Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 112 In Aragon, the Court of Appeal stated that, as a general rule, trial judges have discretion to determine the form that an......
-
R v Cole
...be assessed by the trial judge. If the evidence is not reasonably capable of belief it may be too prejudicial to admit: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 40, citing Handy, at para. 111 In my view, these calls have sufficient threshold probative value when it comes to......
-
R v Adam
...by examining what facts were essential to the jury's verdicts, and then apply those facts when sentencing the offender”: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 106. I must not accept as fact any evidence consistent only with a verdict that was rejected by the jury: Brown,......
-
2023 ONCA 79
...been summarized elsewhere in the charge – would have likely “magnified the potential for prejudice”: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 80. 43 These jury instructions were the product of extensive discussion among all parties. The trial judge prov......
Get Started for Free
24 cases
-
R v Patrick
...should not decide this based on the paper record that was filed. The defence relies on the Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 112 In Aragon, the Court of Appeal stated that, as a general rule, trial judges have discretion to determine the form that an......
-
R v Cole
...be assessed by the trial judge. If the evidence is not reasonably capable of belief it may be too prejudicial to admit: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 40, citing Handy, at para. 111 In my view, these calls have sufficient threshold probative value when it comes to......
-
R v Adam
...by examining what facts were essential to the jury's verdicts, and then apply those facts when sentencing the offender”: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 106. I must not accept as fact any evidence consistent only with a verdict that was rejected by the jury: Brown,......
-
2023 ONCA 79
...been summarized elsewhere in the charge – would have likely “magnified the potential for prejudice”: R. v. Aragon, 2022 ONCA 244, 413 C.C.C. (3d) 79, at para. 80. 43 These jury instructions were the product of extensive discussion among all parties. The trial judge prov......
Get Started for Free