R. v. Arthur (R.C.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 770
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Maisonville, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 770,2013 BCSC 770,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 770 (SC) |
| Date | 25 April 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Arthur (R.C.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2471
...in this matter are set out in the two preceding voir dires of this case. Voir Dire #1 is reported at 2012 BCSC 1960, and Voir Dire #2 at 2013 BCSC 770. It is in Voir Dire #2 that I found that Mr. Arthur's s. 10(b) rights had been breached. Mr. Arthur was the target of a police investigation......
-
R. v. Johnny (D.D.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 811 (SC)
...counsel here argues that in the case at bar there is no suggestion that the accused was not cooperative. [54] The case of R. v. Arthur, 2013 BCSC 770, was also relied upon here. In that case, there was a breach found following a two-hour intentional delay by the officers in circumstances wh......
2 cases
-
R. v. Arthur (R.C.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2471
...in this matter are set out in the two preceding voir dires of this case. Voir Dire #1 is reported at 2012 BCSC 1960, and Voir Dire #2 at 2013 BCSC 770. It is in Voir Dire #2 that I found that Mr. Arthur's s. 10(b) rights had been breached. Mr. Arthur was the target of a police investigation......
-
R. v. Johnny (D.D.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 811 (SC)
...counsel here argues that in the case at bar there is no suggestion that the accused was not cooperative. [54] The case of R. v. Arthur, 2013 BCSC 770, was also relied upon here. In that case, there was a breach found following a two-hour intentional delay by the officers in circumstances wh......