R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Martin,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis,The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton
Citation2018 ABCA 6
Docket Number1701-0058-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date11 January 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Brown,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 9, 2021
    ...identification evidence is entitled to be penetrating and robust: R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398, para 15, 317 CCC (3d) 203; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6, para 16; R v Tat, (1997) 35 OR (3d) 641, p 673, 117 CCC (3d) 481 (CA). Appellate courts may intervene where the identification evidence cannot &#......
  • R v Matchatis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...3 SCR 3 at para 56 [Sinclair]; R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 SCR 732 at para 4 [Lohrer]; R v CEK, 2020 ABCA 2 at para 10; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para 14; R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398 at para [24] A misapprehension of evidence – a failure to consider evidence relevant to a material iss......
  • R v DM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 9, 2022
    ...robust”: Berger JA, dissenting in R v Zurowski, 2003 ABCA 315 at para 46; R v Letendre, 2019 ABCA 179 at para 7; and R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para [35]        In R v Tat (1997), 117 CCC (3d) 481 at 515-516, 1997 CanLII 2234 (CA), Doherty J.A. note......
  • R v Faleh, 2019 ABCA 441
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 18, 2019
    ...review of eyewitness identification is entitled to be penetrating and robust (R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398 at para 15; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para Lawfulness of December 11 arrest [23]           In his written submissions, the appellant ar......
4 cases
  • R v Brown,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 9, 2021
    ...identification evidence is entitled to be penetrating and robust: R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398, para 15, 317 CCC (3d) 203; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6, para 16; R v Tat, (1997) 35 OR (3d) 641, p 673, 117 CCC (3d) 481 (CA). Appellate courts may intervene where the identification evidence cannot &#......
  • R v Matchatis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...3 SCR 3 at para 56 [Sinclair]; R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 SCR 732 at para 4 [Lohrer]; R v CEK, 2020 ABCA 2 at para 10; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para 14; R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398 at para [24] A misapprehension of evidence – a failure to consider evidence relevant to a material iss......
  • R v DM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 9, 2022
    ...robust”: Berger JA, dissenting in R v Zurowski, 2003 ABCA 315 at para 46; R v Letendre, 2019 ABCA 179 at para 7; and R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para [35]        In R v Tat (1997), 117 CCC (3d) 481 at 515-516, 1997 CanLII 2234 (CA), Doherty J.A. note......
  • R v Faleh, 2019 ABCA 441
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 18, 2019
    ...review of eyewitness identification is entitled to be penetrating and robust (R v Mohamed, 2014 ABCA 398 at para 15; R v Assefa, 2018 ABCA 6 at para Lawfulness of December 11 arrest [23]           In his written submissions, the appellant ar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT