R. v. B.F.A., (2011) 272 Man.R.(2d) 158 (QB)

JudgeBryk, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Case DateDecember 01, 2011
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations(2011), 272 Man.R.(2d) 158 (QB);2011 MBQB 277

R. v. B.F.A. (2011), 272 Man.R.(2d) 158 (QB)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2011] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. DE.018

Her Majesty The Queen v. B.F.A. (accused)

(CR 08-01-28913; 2011 MBQB 277)

Indexed As: R. v. B.F.A.

Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench

Winnipeg Centre

Bryk, J.

December 1, 2011.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of sexual assault, sexual touching, utter threats (three counts), and assault causing bodily harm. He pled guilty to fail to comply with a recognizance and fail to comply with a probation order (two counts). He had over 50 prior convictions including six for sexual assault, two for sexual assault causing bodily harm, and a number of violence related offences. The Crown applied for an order pursuant to s. 753 of the Criminal Code declaring the accused to be a dangerous offender.

The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench allowed the application and sentenced the accused to imprisonment for an indeterminate period.

Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Criminal Law - Topic 6552

Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Pattern of repetitive behaviour - The 34 year old aboriginal accused was convicted or pled guilty to several offences including sexual assault, sexual touching, utter threats (three counts), and assault causing bodily harm - He had over 50 prior convictions including six for sexual assault, two for sexual assault causing bodily harm, and a number of violence related offences - He allegedly had a difficult childhood including physical and sexual abuse - He had been out of custody for only 2.5 of the 15.5 years since turning 18 - He had never successfully completed a probation order - His history within the correctional system includes numerous threats and abusive behaviour to Correctional Services staff and inmates - He suffered from an anti-social personality and chronic alcohol and substance abuse - There was a high risk for future acts of sexual violence - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench declared the accused to be a dangerous offender sentenced him to imprisonment for an indeterminate period - He had demonstrated a pattern of repetitive behaviour, including for sexual assaults - He constituted a threat to life, safety or physical or mental well-being of other persons - He showed a substantial degree of indifference respecting the reasonably foreseeable consequences to other persons of his behaviour - There was a substantial risk of him re-offending - There was no evidence that he could be rehabilitated within a certain timeframe and that successful treatment could be accomplished within that timeframe aided by a period of community supervision.

Criminal Law - Topic 6558

Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Dangerous sexual offender - [See Criminal Law - Topic 6552 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 6562

Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Persistent aggressive behaviour - [See Criminal Law - Topic 6552 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 6563

Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Indifference respecting consequences of behaviour to others - [See Criminal Law - Topic 6552 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Neve (L.C.) (1999), 237 A.R. 201; 197 W.A.C. 201; 137 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 1999 ABCA 206, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Goforth (E.R.) (2005), 257 Sask.R. 123; 342 W.A.C. 123; 193 C.C.C.(3d) 354; 2005 SKCA 12, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Cook (D.A.) (2010), 259 Man.R.(2d) 109; 2010 MBQB 237, refd to. [para. 15].

R. v. Johnson (J.J.), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 357; 308 N.R. 333; 186 B.C.A.C. 161; 306 W.A.C. 161; 2003 SCC 46, refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Casemore (D.R.) (2009), 336 Sask.R. 110; 2009 SKQB 306, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309; 80 N.R. 161; 82 N.S.R.(2d) 271; 207 A.P.R. 271, refd to. [para. 25].

R. v. Pedden (B.A.) (2005), 208 B.C.A.C. 303; 344 W.A.C. 303; 194 C.C.C.(3d) 476; 2005 BCCA 121, refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. Ominayak (R.D.) (2007), 443 A.R. 1; 2007 ABQB 442, refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. Otto (M.E.) (2006), 279 Sask.R. 182; 372 W.A.C. 182; 2006 SKCA 52, refd to. [para. 29].

R. v. Little (G.) (2007), 226 O.A.C. 148; 225 C.C.C.(3d) 20; 2007 ONCA 548, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Peters (D.W.A.), [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 672; 70 W.C.B.(2d) 624; 2006 BCSC 1288, refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Higginbottom (C.) (2001), 150 O.A.C. 79; 156 C.C.C.(3d) 178 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. Moosomin (L.W.), [2009] 1 W.W.R. 608; 320 Sask.R. 100; 444 W.A.C. 100; 2008 SKCA 169, refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Pontello (1977), 38 C.C.C.(2d) 262 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 34].

R. v. Carleton, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 148; 32 A.R. 181; 69 C.C.C.(2d) 1 (C.A.), affd. [1983] 2 S.C.R. 58; 47 A.R. 160; 52 N.R. 293; 6 C.C.C.(3d) 480, refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. Currie (R.O.R.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 260; 211 N.R. 321; 100 O.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 276].

R. v. Johnson (J.J.), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 357; 308 N.R. 333; 186 B.C.A.C. 161; 306 W.A.C. 161; 2003 SCC 46, refd to. [para. 277].

R. v. Roberts (R.) (2007), 220 O.A.C. 46; 219 C.C.C.(3d) 32; 2007 ONCA 64, refd to. [para. 278].

R. v. Dow (D.R.) (1999), 120 B.C.A.C. 16; 196 W.A.C. 16; 134 C.C.C.(3d) 323; 1999 BCCA 177, refd to. [para. 296].

R. v. George (T.) (1998), 109 B.C.A.C. 32; 177 W.A.C. 32; 126 C.C.C.(3d) 384 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 297].

R. v. Ewenin (M.C.) (2009), 334 Sask.R. 61; 2009 SKQB 207, refd to. [para. 306].

R. v. Innocent, [2009] O.J. No. 3663 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 313].

Counsel:

D. Mann and K. Sharma, for the Crown;

M. Wasyliw, for the accused.

This application was heard before Bryk, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, who delivered the following decision on December 1, 2011.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1391
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 20, 2012
    ...has consistently found favour in the Superior Courts of most provinces other than Alberta. In Manitoba see, for example, R. v. B.F.A. , 2011 MBQB 277 at para. 16, 272 Man.R. (2d) 158; and R. v. Cook , 2010 MBQB 237 at para. 25, 259 Man.R. (2d) 109. In Saskatchewan see, for example, R. v. Fu......
  • R. v. B.F.A., (2012) 288 Man.R.(2d) 80 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 6, 2012
    ...reject or accept all, or part, or none of an expert's evidence. In this case, the judge referenced the expert's position in his reasons (2011 MBQB 277 at para. 309): [B.F.A.'s] lengthy criminal history satisfies me that there is a substantial risk of his re-offending unless and until he add......
  • R. v. Davis (J.R.), [2012] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 13, 2012
    ...started at age 13 and included 47 non-violent offences and seven violent offences. Closer to home, in Manitoba, in R. v. Atatise , 2011 MBQB 277, M.J. 390 (QL), the predicate offences included sexual assault, sexual touching, uttering threats, and assault causing bodily harm. Mr. Atatise ha......
  • R. v. Cook (S.), (2012) 274 Man.R.(2d) 163 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada)
    • February 2, 2012
    ...Ct.), refd to. [para. 85]. R. v. Shorting (R.D.), [2011] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 39; 2011 MBQB 106, refd to. [para. 85]. R. v. B.F.A. (2011), 272 Man.R.(2d) 158; 2011 MBQB 277, refd to. [para. R. v. Atatise - see R. v. B.F.A. R. v. Cook (D.A.) (2010), 259 Man.R.(2d) 109; 2010 MBQB 237, refd to. [p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1391
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 20, 2012
    ...has consistently found favour in the Superior Courts of most provinces other than Alberta. In Manitoba see, for example, R. v. B.F.A. , 2011 MBQB 277 at para. 16, 272 Man.R. (2d) 158; and R. v. Cook , 2010 MBQB 237 at para. 25, 259 Man.R. (2d) 109. In Saskatchewan see, for example, R. v. Fu......
  • R. v. B.F.A., (2012) 288 Man.R.(2d) 80 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 6, 2012
    ...reject or accept all, or part, or none of an expert's evidence. In this case, the judge referenced the expert's position in his reasons (2011 MBQB 277 at para. 309): [B.F.A.'s] lengthy criminal history satisfies me that there is a substantial risk of his re-offending unless and until he add......
  • R. v. Davis (J.R.), [2012] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 13, 2012
    ...started at age 13 and included 47 non-violent offences and seven violent offences. Closer to home, in Manitoba, in R. v. Atatise , 2011 MBQB 277, M.J. 390 (QL), the predicate offences included sexual assault, sexual touching, uttering threats, and assault causing bodily harm. Mr. Atatise ha......
  • R. v. Cook (S.), (2012) 274 Man.R.(2d) 163 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada)
    • February 2, 2012
    ...Ct.), refd to. [para. 85]. R. v. Shorting (R.D.), [2011] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 39; 2011 MBQB 106, refd to. [para. 85]. R. v. B.F.A. (2011), 272 Man.R.(2d) 158; 2011 MBQB 277, refd to. [para. R. v. Atatise - see R. v. B.F.A. R. v. Cook (D.A.) (2010), 259 Man.R.(2d) 109; 2010 MBQB 237, refd to. [p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT