R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Ker
Citation2020 BCSC 1377
Date11 September 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number26150, 26596
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Hartford,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 30, 2022
    ...should provide the court with their reasoning and justification for the sentence they are urging upon the court: see also R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377 at paras. 61-71 and 85-106. I am comfortable that counsel have met this requirement Application of the General Sentencing Principles [32] ......
  • R. v. Kruger-Allen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 5, 2021
    ...matter. [73]        In sum, the officers’ misconduct was not egregious; compare R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377 at para. 30, where police misconduct amounted to an abuse of process, and R. v. Punko, 2010 BCCA 365 at para. 81, where police misconduct cau......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...Last year I provided a detailed explanation of the purpose of honouring joint submissions in R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377. That explanation remains relevant [62] A joint submission is when the Crown and defence agree to recommend a particular sentence to the judge in exchange for the accused......
3 cases
  • R. v. Kruger-Allen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 5, 2021
    ...matter. [73]        In sum, the officers’ misconduct was not egregious; compare R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377 at para. 30, where police misconduct amounted to an abuse of process, and R. v. Punko, 2010 BCCA 365 at para. 81, where police misconduct cau......
  • R. v. Hartford,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 30, 2022
    ...should provide the court with their reasoning and justification for the sentence they are urging upon the court: see also R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377 at paras. 61-71 and 85-106. I am comfortable that counsel have met this requirement Application of the General Sentencing Principles [32] ......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...Last year I provided a detailed explanation of the purpose of honouring joint submissions in R. v. Bacon, 2020 BCSC 1377. That explanation remains relevant [62] A joint submission is when the Crown and defence agree to recommend a particular sentence to the judge in exchange for the accused......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT