R v Badger,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Caldwell, Tholl and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 118 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 118 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 01 September 2021 |
| Docket Number | CACR3347 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
R v Croswell
...reliability ( R v Stevenson, 2024 SKCA 40 at para 61, 436 CCC (3d) 279 [ Stevenson CA], aff'd 2024 SCC 41, 442 CCC (3d) 397; R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118, 406 CCC (3d) 459; R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145 at para 70, 217 CCC (3d) 441). An argument that a judge failed to sufficiently scrutinize ident......
-
R v Boucher
...is admitted because the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded: R v MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811 at para 42; R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118 at para 31, aff'd 2022 SCC 20. Some of those non-exhaustive factors can be found in the following three questions (see also R v Andrews, [19......
2 cases
-
R v Croswell
...reliability ( R v Stevenson, 2024 SKCA 40 at para 61, 436 CCC (3d) 279 [ Stevenson CA], aff'd 2024 SCC 41, 442 CCC (3d) 397; R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118, 406 CCC (3d) 459; R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145 at para 70, 217 CCC (3d) 441). An argument that a judge failed to sufficiently scrutinize ident......
-
R v Boucher
...is admitted because the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded: R v MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811 at para 42; R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118 at para 31, aff'd 2022 SCC 20. Some of those non-exhaustive factors can be found in the following three questions (see also R v Andrews, [19......