R v Baker
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Schutz,Wakeling,Watson |
| Citation | 2023 ABCA 136 |
| Date | 25 April 2023 |
| Docket Number | 2103-0163A |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
...... seventy-five percent of the taxed costs and outstanding disbursements relating to support issues”). [69] The King v. Baker, 2023 ABCA 136, ¶ 48 per Watson & Wakeling, [70] Alta. Reg. 124/2010. [71] Black’s Law Dictionary 51 (11th ed. B. Garner ed. in chief 2019) (“The body of rules ......
-
Digiuseppe Interior Design Ltd v. St Albert (City)
...see eg Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc, 2020 SCC 25 at para 29, [2020] 3 SCR 3; Sedgwick at para 84; R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at para 60, 425 CCC (3d) 359. Accordingly, the Legislature has stated that judicial discretion starts after permission is granted, which is not......
-
R v. Bulatci
...not been litigated, including cases where the constitutional issue could have been raised and was not. See for example R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 and R v Tam Le, 2023 MBKB 118. The fact remains that, where challenged, the retrospective application of the substantial likelihood thr......
-
Battle River Power Coop v. Alberta Utilities Commission
...a bill during second reading and when the court is considering a pointed amendment to one aspect of an established scheme: R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at paras 90-94; Sharma at para 99. [35] The interrelationship between sections 29 and 32 outlined abo......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
...... seventy-five percent of the taxed costs and outstanding disbursements relating to support issues”). [69] The King v. Baker, 2023 ABCA 136, ¶ 48 per Watson & Wakeling, [70] Alta. Reg. 124/2010. [71] Black’s Law Dictionary 51 (11th ed. B. Garner ed. in chief 2019) (“The body of rules ......
-
Digiuseppe Interior Design Ltd v. St Albert (City)
...see eg Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc, 2020 SCC 25 at para 29, [2020] 3 SCR 3; Sedgwick at para 84; R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at para 60, 425 CCC (3d) 359. Accordingly, the Legislature has stated that judicial discretion starts after permission is granted, which is not......
-
R v. Bulatci
...not been litigated, including cases where the constitutional issue could have been raised and was not. See for example R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 and R v Tam Le, 2023 MBKB 118. The fact remains that, where challenged, the retrospective application of the substantial likelihood thr......
-
Battle River Power Coop v. Alberta Utilities Commission
...a bill during second reading and when the court is considering a pointed amendment to one aspect of an established scheme: R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at paras 90-94; Sharma at para 99. [35] The interrelationship between sections 29 and 32 outlined abo......
Get Started for Free
