R v Baker,
| Judge | Schutz,Wakeling,Watson |
| Citation | 2023 ABCA 136 |
| Docket Number | 2103-0163A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 25 April 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Baker,
...His Majesty the King Respondent and Jared Eugene Baker Appellant 2023 ABCA 136 The Court: The Honourable Justice Jack Watson The Honourable Justice Thomas W. Wakeling The Honourable Justice Frederica Schutz * Docket: 2103-0163A Registry: Edmonton In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal fro......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...… seventy-five percent of the taxed costs and outstanding disbursements relating to support issues”). 69 The King v. Baker, 2023 ABCA 136, ¶ 48 per Watson & Wakeling, 70 Alta. Reg. 124/2010. 71 Black's Law Dictionary 51 (11th ed. B. Garner ed. in chief 2019) (&#x......
-
Alberta Energy v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner),
...imposed by sections 59(1) & (3). • In relation to the last two points above, I cite the Court of Appeal in R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at para 56: “… if the text bears only one permissible meaning, there should be no power of the courts to adjust that explicit meaning ......
3 cases
-
R v Baker,
...His Majesty the King Respondent and Jared Eugene Baker Appellant 2023 ABCA 136 The Court: The Honourable Justice Jack Watson The Honourable Justice Thomas W. Wakeling The Honourable Justice Frederica Schutz * Docket: 2103-0163A Registry: Edmonton In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal fro......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...… seventy-five percent of the taxed costs and outstanding disbursements relating to support issues”). 69 The King v. Baker, 2023 ABCA 136, ¶ 48 per Watson & Wakeling, 70 Alta. Reg. 124/2010. 71 Black's Law Dictionary 51 (11th ed. B. Garner ed. in chief 2019) (&#x......
-
Alberta Energy v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner),
...imposed by sections 59(1) & (3). • In relation to the last two points above, I cite the Court of Appeal in R v Baker, 2023 ABCA 136 at para 56: “… if the text bears only one permissible meaning, there should be no power of the courts to adjust that explicit meaning ......