R. v. Baldree (C.)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ. |
| Citation | [2013] N.R. TBEd. JN.012,2013 SCC 35,[2013] 2 SCR 520,298 CCC (3d) 425,445 NR 247,JE 2013-1081 |
| Date | 19 June 2013 |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Grandine
...knowingly ingest the drug (lorazepam) that was undoubtedly in her system at the time of her hospitalization. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at para. 39 (S.C.C.) where Fish J. stated on behalf of the Court that, “The relevance of the statement thus hinges on the truth of the ......
-
R. v. Blackwood
...period of time after the arrest of a suspected drug trafficker, without seeking or obtaining a general warrant. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at paras. 13-14, 54, 71-2, and 85-8 (S.C.C.); R. v. Edwards (1994), 91 C.C.C. (3d) 123 at pp. 133 and 137-8 (Ont. C.A.). Using the s......
-
R. v. C.M.
...the declarant's perception, memory, narration or sincerity: Regina v. Khelawon [2006] SCC 57 at paragraph two; Regina v. Baldree [2013] SCC 35 at paragraph The presumptive inadmissibility of hearsay may be overcome where its proponent establishes on a balance of probabilities that what......
-
R. v. Mortley
...consideration of its necessity and reliability in light of the well-known dangers associated with such evidence: R. v. Baldree, [2013] 2 SCR 520, 2013 SCC 35 (CanLII) (at para. 31-36). The defence submits I concur as a matter of common sense and a clear implication of Khan that I have a res......
2 cases
-
R. v. Blackwood
...period of time after the arrest of a suspected drug trafficker, without seeking or obtaining a general warrant. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at paras. 13-14, 54, 71-2, and 85-8 (S.C.C.); R. v. Edwards (1994), 91 C.C.C. (3d) 123 at pp. 133 and 137-8 (Ont. C.A.). Using the s......
-
R. v. Grandine
...knowingly ingest the drug (lorazepam) that was undoubtedly in her system at the time of her hospitalization. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at para. 39 (S.C.C.) where Fish J. stated on behalf of the Court that, “The relevance of the statement thus hinges on the truth of the ......
1 provisions
-
Commercial Vehicle Dimension and Weight Regulation (Download Version)
...exceed 15 200 kilograms, (d) the cross‑section dimension of the tire, as determined by the manufacturer’s width shown on the tire, is 385, 425 or 445 millimetres, (e) any load, when loaded on the deck of the truck, is positioned such that no additional weight is placed on the twin steer axl......
