R. v. Baldree (C.), [2013] N.R. TBEd. JN.012

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date19 June 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Blackwood,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 décembre 2021
    ...period of time after the arrest of a suspected drug trafficker, without seeking or obtaining a general warrant. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at paras. 13-14, 54, 71-2, and 85-8 (S.C.C.); R. v. Edwards (1994), 91 C.C.C. (3d) 123 at pp. 133 and 137-8 (Ont. C.A.). Using the s......
  • R. v. C.M., 2018 ONCJ 590
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • 26 juin 2018
    ...the declarant's perception, memory, narration or sincerity: Regina v. Khelawon [2006] SCC 57 at paragraph two; Regina v. Baldree [2013] SCC 35 at paragraph The presumptive inadmissibility of hearsay may be overcome where its proponent establishes on a balance of probabilities that what......
  • R. v. Mortley, 2017 ONSC 3858
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 juin 2017
    ...consideration of its necessity and reliability in light of the well-known dangers associated with such evidence: R. v. Baldree, [2013] 2 SCR 520, 2013 SCC 35 (CanLII) (at para. 31-36). The defence submits I concur as a matter of common sense and a clear implication of Khan that I have a res......
  • R. v. Grandine, 2018 ONSC 5646
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 septembre 2018
    ...knowingly ingest the drug (lorazepam) that was undoubtedly in her system at the time of her hospitalization. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at para. 39 (S.C.C.) where Fish J. stated on behalf of the Court that, “The relevance of the statement thus hinges on the truth of the ......
4 cases
  • R. v. Blackwood,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 décembre 2021
    ...period of time after the arrest of a suspected drug trafficker, without seeking or obtaining a general warrant. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at paras. 13-14, 54, 71-2, and 85-8 (S.C.C.); R. v. Edwards (1994), 91 C.C.C. (3d) 123 at pp. 133 and 137-8 (Ont. C.A.). Using the s......
  • R. v. C.M., 2018 ONCJ 590
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • 26 juin 2018
    ...the declarant's perception, memory, narration or sincerity: Regina v. Khelawon [2006] SCC 57 at paragraph two; Regina v. Baldree [2013] SCC 35 at paragraph The presumptive inadmissibility of hearsay may be overcome where its proponent establishes on a balance of probabilities that what......
  • R. v. Mortley, 2017 ONSC 3858
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 juin 2017
    ...consideration of its necessity and reliability in light of the well-known dangers associated with such evidence: R. v. Baldree, [2013] 2 SCR 520, 2013 SCC 35 (CanLII) (at para. 31-36). The defence submits I concur as a matter of common sense and a clear implication of Khan that I have a res......
  • R. v. Grandine, 2018 ONSC 5646
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 septembre 2018
    ...knowingly ingest the drug (lorazepam) that was undoubtedly in her system at the time of her hospitalization. See: R. v. Baldree (2013), 298 C.C.C. (3d) 425 at para. 39 (S.C.C.) where Fish J. stated on behalf of the Court that, “The relevance of the statement thus hinges on the truth of the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT