R v Ballantyne
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Barrington-Foote,Jackson,Schwann |
| Citation | 2022 SKCA 13 |
| Docket Number | CACR3301 |
| Date | 26 January 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
R v Napope
...must be considered in every case before a sentence is imposed, including the imposition of an indeterminate sentence ( R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para 23 [ Ballantyne]; Boutilier at paras 43-44). When Indigenous offenders are sentenced under s. 753(4.1), sentencing judges must consider......
-
R v Bird
...whether and to what extent culturally specific treatment and programming can serve to reduce the offender's risk ( R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para 23; Napope at para 39 In R v White, 2022 BCCA 91 [ White], the British Columbia Court of Appeal explained that the backward-looking an......
4 cases
-
R v Napope
...must be considered in every case before a sentence is imposed, including the imposition of an indeterminate sentence ( R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para 23 [ Ballantyne]; Boutilier at paras 43-44). When Indigenous offenders are sentenced under s. 753(4.1), sentencing judges must consider......
-
R v Sewap
...of review apply at the penalty stage ( Boutilier at para 88; R v Stevenson, 2025 SKCA 13 at para 47, [2025] 5 WWR 40; R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para B. The alleged errors at the designation stage 43 At the designation stage of a dangerous offender proceeding, the Crown bears the burde......
-
R v Stevenson
...1 S.C.R. 500, or R. v. McDonnell, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948, to be applicable to this situation” (at para 33). This Court in R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para 31, held, citing Currie and Boutilier, that absent errors in law, an appellate court may intervene if the sentencing judge's imposition......
-
R v Bird
...whether and to what extent culturally specific treatment and programming can serve to reduce the offender's risk ( R v Ballantyne, 2022 SKCA 13 at para 23; Napope at para 39 In R v White, 2022 BCCA 91 [ White], the British Columbia Court of Appeal explained that the backward-looking an......
