R v Barton
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Hillier |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 284 |
| Date | 23 April 2020 |
| Docket Number | 120294731Q2 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
R v Barton
...8 Charter right to be secure against unreasonable seizure. He sought to exclude the evidence obtained as a result. B. Pre-trial ruling: 2020 ABQB 284 [78] In R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 [Ruling #2], the trial judge considered whether the police had statutory authority to seize the duffel bag ......
-
R v. Chung
...more than one motive and may have an evolving state of knowledge and investigative intent ....”; see also Ali at para 6 and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284, Hillier J at paras 57 and 61 [appeal dismissed, R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34, a decision issued after these reasons were delivered [34] In Nolet......
-
R v Barton
...24(2) of the Charter to exclude evidence gathered from a search of his computer in breach of his s. 8 Charter rights. [2] In R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 (Barton 2020 #2), I noted that while there were some omissions or inaccuracies in the Information to Obtain (ITO), these did not justify qua......
-
R v Barton
...and these circumstances have been described in the earlier voir dire decisions: R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 247 (Barton 2020 #1); R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 (Barton 2020 #2); R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 448 (Barton 2020 #3); and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 564 (Barton 2020 #4). I will use the term “Putative e......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
R v Barton
...8 Charter right to be secure against unreasonable seizure. He sought to exclude the evidence obtained as a result. B. Pre-trial ruling: 2020 ABQB 284 [78] In R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 [Ruling #2], the trial judge considered whether the police had statutory authority to seize the duffel bag ......
-
R v. Chung
...more than one motive and may have an evolving state of knowledge and investigative intent ....”; see also Ali at para 6 and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284, Hillier J at paras 57 and 61 [appeal dismissed, R v Barton, 2024 ABCA 34, a decision issued after these reasons were delivered [34] In Nolet......
-
R v Barton
...24(2) of the Charter to exclude evidence gathered from a search of his computer in breach of his s. 8 Charter rights. [2] In R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 (Barton 2020 #2), I noted that while there were some omissions or inaccuracies in the Information to Obtain (ITO), these did not justify qua......
-
R v Barton
...and these circumstances have been described in the earlier voir dire decisions: R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 247 (Barton 2020 #1); R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 284 (Barton 2020 #2); R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 448 (Barton 2020 #3); and R v Barton, 2020 ABQB 564 (Barton 2020 #4). I will use the term “Putative e......
Get Started for Free
