R. v. BENJAMIN MASAO KEDOIN, 2020 SKQB 121

JudgeDANYLIUK J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Case DateApril 29, 2020
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations2020 SKQB 121
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R. v. B. T. D., 2020 NSSC 165
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...might pose a heightened health risk to them.” I endorse the reasons in Justice Danyliuk’s decision at paras. 36-60 in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121. [9] In contrast for example, see the general trend of jurisprudence in Ontario, including in R v AF, 2020 ONSC 2880 per Goodman J at para 30, issu......
  • R. v. DILLON,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 12, 2021
    ...in custodial facilities has not gained much traction in Saskatchewan. A discussion of the pertinent authorities is found in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121. [93]                       ......
  • R. v. FRENCHMAN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 28, 2020
    ...of a second wave of the virus in upcoming months, is sufficient on its own to justify judicial interim release. See R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121; R v Boudreau, 2020 SKQB 88; and R v Bear, 2020 SKQB [24]              ......
  • R. v. KAY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 17, 2022
    ...I dealt with the seemingly constant pressure to extend the concept of judicial notice in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121, which was a s. 520 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, bail review. I was invited to take judicial notice of many things occurring at that time, including how COVID-19 would affe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. B. T. D., 2020 NSSC 165
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...might pose a heightened health risk to them.” I endorse the reasons in Justice Danyliuk’s decision at paras. 36-60 in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121. [9] In contrast for example, see the general trend of jurisprudence in Ontario, including in R v AF, 2020 ONSC 2880 per Goodman J at para 30, issu......
  • R. v. DILLON,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 12, 2021
    ...in custodial facilities has not gained much traction in Saskatchewan. A discussion of the pertinent authorities is found in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121. [93]                       ......
  • R. v. FRENCHMAN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 28, 2020
    ...of a second wave of the virus in upcoming months, is sufficient on its own to justify judicial interim release. See R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121; R v Boudreau, 2020 SKQB 88; and R v Bear, 2020 SKQB [24]              ......
  • R. v. KAY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 17, 2022
    ...I dealt with the seemingly constant pressure to extend the concept of judicial notice in R v Kedoin, 2020 SKQB 121, which was a s. 520 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, bail review. I was invited to take judicial notice of many things occurring at that time, including how COVID-19 would affe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT