R v Bethinger, 2020 ABQB 253

JudgeFagnan
Citation2020 ABQB 253
Docket Number180320186Q1
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date14 April 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R v Arntsen, 2020 ABPC 264
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 December 2020
    ...as the pre-event and post-event proposed evidence. Case Law Referred to [9] The following cases were submitted by Defence: R v Bethinger, 2020 ABQB 253, R v Darrach, 2000 SCC 46, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 443, R v Abdulkadir, 2009 ABQB 602, R v Goldfinch, [2019] S.C.J. No. 38, R v S.L., 2018 ABQB 889......
  • R v Harnett, 2022 ABQB 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 February 2022
    ...the evidence supporting the application and submissions. The Complainant does not have a role in the s. 278.93 application: R v Behinger, 2020 ABQB 253, Fagnan J at para B. The s. 278.94 Hearing [15]        The s. 278.94 hearing is to determine whether the......
  • Reilly v Alberta, 2022 ABKB 612
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 September 2022
    ...Alberta’s position (AB, paras 211-3, relying on Spring v Goodyear Canada Inc., 2020 ABQB 253 at para 135, Pasian v Academic Clinician’s Management Services, 2013 ONSC 7787 also at para 135, and Williams v Mutual Life Assurance Company (2000), 51 OR (3d) 54 (Ont SCJ) at para 39......
3 cases
  • R v Arntsen, 2020 ABPC 264
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 December 2020
    ...as the pre-event and post-event proposed evidence. Case Law Referred to [9] The following cases were submitted by Defence: R v Bethinger, 2020 ABQB 253, R v Darrach, 2000 SCC 46, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 443, R v Abdulkadir, 2009 ABQB 602, R v Goldfinch, [2019] S.C.J. No. 38, R v S.L., 2018 ABQB 889......
  • R v Harnett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 February 2022
    ...the evidence supporting the application and submissions. The Complainant does not have a role in the s. 278.93 application: R v Behinger, 2020 ABQB 253, Fagnan J at para B. The s. 278.94 Hearing [15]        The s. 278.94 hearing is to determine whether the......
  • Reilly v Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 September 2022
    ...Alberta’s position (AB, paras 211-3, relying on Spring v Goodyear Canada Inc., 2020 ABQB 253 at para 135, Pasian v Academic Clinician’s Management Services, 2013 ONSC 7787 also at para 135, and Williams v Mutual Life Assurance Company (2000), 51 OR (3d) 54 (Ont SCJ) at para 39......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT