R v BHS, 2020 ABPC 132

JudgeHonourable Judge C.K.W. Thietke
Citation2020 ABPC 132
Date23 July 2020
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number160159984P1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • R. v. E.A.G.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...degree, notwithstanding that the seed is not emitted”. For the reasons expressed in R. v. K.H., 2015 ONSC 7760 and R. v. B.H.S., 2020 ABPC 132, with which I agree, intercourse includes anal intercourse. [6] E.A.G. denies all allegations of sexual contact with J.A.G. Uncontentious Background......
1 cases
  • R. v. E.A.G.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...degree, notwithstanding that the seed is not emitted”. For the reasons expressed in R. v. K.H., 2015 ONSC 7760 and R. v. B.H.S., 2020 ABPC 132, with which I agree, intercourse includes anal intercourse. [6] E.A.G. denies all allegations of sexual contact with J.A.G. Uncontentious Background......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT