R. v. Bilinski (J.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2824
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Durno, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS,BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS |
| Date | 20 June 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Allahyar, 2017 ONCA 345
...of licensed paralegals have been addressed in recent cases such as R. v. Khan, 2015 ONCJ 221, [2015] O.J. No. 2096 and R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824, [2013] O.J. No. 2984. Nothing this decision is intended to address representation by licensed paralegals in provincial offence matters. The ......
-
Toronto (City) v. Zhen,
...lay people – they are licenced paralegals with professional obligations that offer paid services to the public. In R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824 at paras. 51-57, Justice Durno provides a helpful summary of the evolution of paralegals, going from an unregulated industry to becoming l......
-
R. v. Paisley (J.M.), 2016 ABQB 152
...(2d) 410 (CA) at para 9, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 30684 (24 March, 2005), R v GDB , [2000] 1 SCR 520 at 537, and R v Bilinski , 2013 ONSC 2824 at para 83, in the context of representation by a paralegal. If this is demonstrated, the result at trial may be rendered unreliable and a mi......
3 cases
-
R. v. Allahyar, 2017 ONCA 345
...of licensed paralegals have been addressed in recent cases such as R. v. Khan, 2015 ONCJ 221, [2015] O.J. No. 2096 and R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824, [2013] O.J. No. 2984. Nothing this decision is intended to address representation by licensed paralegals in provincial offence matters. The ......
-
Toronto (City) v. Zhen,
...lay people – they are licenced paralegals with professional obligations that offer paid services to the public. In R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824 at paras. 51-57, Justice Durno provides a helpful summary of the evolution of paralegals, going from an unregulated industry to becoming l......
-
R. v. Paisley (J.M.), 2016 ABQB 152
...(2d) 410 (CA) at para 9, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 30684 (24 March, 2005), R v GDB , [2000] 1 SCR 520 at 537, and R v Bilinski , 2013 ONSC 2824 at para 83, in the context of representation by a paralegal. If this is demonstrated, the result at trial may be rendered unreliable and a mi......