R. v. Bilinski (J.)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Durno, J. |
| Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2824,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2824 (SC),2013 ONSC 2824 |
| Date | 20 June 2011 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS,BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Paisley (J.M.), 2016 ABQB 152
...(2d) 410 (CA) at para 9, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 30684 (24 March, 2005), R v GDB , [2000] 1 SCR 520 at 537, and R v Bilinski , 2013 ONSC 2824 at para 83, in the context of representation by a paralegal. If this is demonstrated, the result at trial may be rendered unreliable and a mi......
-
R. v. Allahyar
...of licensed paralegals have been addressed in recent cases such as R. v. Khan, 2015 ONCJ 221, [2015] O.J. No. 2096 and R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824, [2013] O.J. No. 2984. Nothing this decision is intended to address representation by licensed paralegals in provincial offence matters. The ......
-
Toronto (City) v. Zhen
...lay people – they are licenced paralegals with professional obligations that offer paid services to the public. In R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824 at paras. 51-57, Justice Durno provides a helpful summary of the evolution of paralegals, going from an unregulated industry to becoming l......
3 cases
-
R. v. Paisley (J.M.), 2016 ABQB 152
...(2d) 410 (CA) at para 9, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 30684 (24 March, 2005), R v GDB , [2000] 1 SCR 520 at 537, and R v Bilinski , 2013 ONSC 2824 at para 83, in the context of representation by a paralegal. If this is demonstrated, the result at trial may be rendered unreliable and a mi......
-
R. v. Allahyar
...of licensed paralegals have been addressed in recent cases such as R. v. Khan, 2015 ONCJ 221, [2015] O.J. No. 2096 and R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824, [2013] O.J. No. 2984. Nothing this decision is intended to address representation by licensed paralegals in provincial offence matters. The ......
-
Toronto (City) v. Zhen
...lay people – they are licenced paralegals with professional obligations that offer paid services to the public. In R. v. Bilinski, 2013 ONSC 2824 at paras. 51-57, Justice Durno provides a helpful summary of the evolution of paralegals, going from an unregulated industry to becoming l......