R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell
Citation2017 SCC 12,[2017] 1 SCR 170,407 DLR (4th) 384,345 CCC (3d) 306
Docket Number36610
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date23 February 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
104 practice notes
  • Feher c. Canada (Sécurité publique et Protection civile),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 20, 2019
    ...(3d) 301; White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182; R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 170; R. v. D.D., 2000 SCC 43, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275; Centrale des syndicats du Québec v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2018 SCC 18, [2018] 1 S.C......
  • International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 6, 2022
    ...Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182 at para. 24 [White Burgess]; see also: R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 170 at paras. 16-17. [51] Before discussing the application of these criteria, it is worth considering, as pointed out by van Ert,......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 26 ' April 30, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2021
    ...2017 ONCA 502, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 343, R. v. Sekhon, 2014 SCC 15, R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, Marshall v. Watson Wyatt & Co. (2002), 209 D.L.R. (4th) 411 (Ont. C.A.), Harris v. Leikin Group Inc., 2014 ONCA 479, Maurice v. Alles, 2016 ONCA ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...413 R v Binder, [1948] OR 607 (CA) ..................................................................411, 413 R v Bingley, [2017] 1 SCR 170 ................................................................10, 261, 272 R v Biniaris (1998), 124 CCC (3d) 58 (BC CA), rev’d [2000] 1 SCR 381 ...........
  • Request a trial to view additional results
89 cases
  • Feher c. Canada (Sécurité publique et Protection civile),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 20, 2019
    ...(3d) 301; White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182; R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 170; R. v. D.D., 2000 SCC 43, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275; Centrale des syndicats du Québec v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2018 SCC 18, [2018] 1 S.C......
  • International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 6, 2022
    ...Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182 at para. 24 [White Burgess]; see also: R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 170 at paras. 16-17. [51] Before discussing the application of these criteria, it is worth considering, as pointed out by van Ert,......
  • Moffat c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 5, 2019
    ...Santos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1326; Olalere v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 385; R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 170; R. v. Sekhon, 2014 SCC 15, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 272; Canadian Recording Industry Association v. Society of Composers, Autho......
  • R v Sandoval-Barillas, 2017 ABCA 154
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 24, 2017
    ...(City), 2015 SCC 16 at para 105, [2015] 2 SCR 3. The Supreme Court has encapsulated its recent expositions on this topic in R v Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, 345 CCC (3d) 306 as follows:14 The expert evidence analysis is divided into two stages. First, the evidence must meet the four Mohan factors:......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 26 ' April 30, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2021
    ...2017 ONCA 502, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 343, R. v. Sekhon, 2014 SCC 15, R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, R. v. Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, Marshall v. Watson Wyatt & Co. (2002), 209 D.L.R. (4th) 411 (Ont. C.A.), Harris v. Leikin Group Inc., 2014 ONCA 479, Maurice v. Alles, 2016 ONCA ......
  • Legalizing Marijuana: Drug Recognition Experts And Drug-Impaired Driving - Additional Considerations For Insurers Following Supreme Court Decision
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 24, 2017
    ...is significant) so that they are not prejudiced in their ability to properly defend an anticipated civil action. Footnotes Paragraph 9. 2017 SCC 12 Paragraphs The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about y......
  • Driving High - The Future Is Hazy For Canadian Automobile Insurers Once Cannabis Goes Legal
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 7, 2017
    ...in drivers under the influence of drugs. Although subjective in nature, the Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled in R v Bingley, 2017 SCC 12 that the opinion of a drug recognition expert may be admitted as expert evidence at trial without the evidence being first submitted to a voir dire,......
  • 2017: The SCC Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 10, 2018
    ...to resolve conflicting jurisprudence on the issue of bail pending appeal, which is otherwise evasive of appellate review. R v Bingley, 2017 SCC 12 At issue in this appeal was whether the opinion of a certified drug recognition expert (DRE) is automatically admissible at trial, pursuant to s......
9 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...413 R v Binder, [1948] OR 607 (CA) ..................................................................411, 413 R v Bingley, [2017] 1 SCR 170 ................................................................10, 261, 272 R v Biniaris (1998), 124 CCC (3d) 58 (BC CA), rev’d [2000] 1 SCR 381 ...........
  • Opinion and Expert Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...16 at para 46. 158 R v Marquard , [1993] 4 SCR 223 [ Marquard ], and see R v Colas (2001), 161 CCC (3d) 335 (Ont CA). 159 R v Bingley , [2017] 1 SCR 170 at para 27 [ Bingley ]. 160 Ibid. 161 Ibid at para 27. The Criminal Code provision that the Court considered in Bingley has been amended. ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...providing for proof of documents and electronic information in civil proceedings before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. 18 R v Bingley , [2017] 1 SCR 170. Introduction 11 3. TRENDS IN THE LAW OF EVIDENCE Four trends have marked the progress of evidence law in Canada over the past three decad......
  • Digest: R v Prokopchuk, 2018 SKQB 184
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • June 18, 2019
    ...RSC 1985, c C-46, s 655 Cases Considered: R v Aden, 2015 SKCA 59, 460 Sask R 98 R v Ahpay, 2017 SKQB 352, 145 WCB (2d) 174 R v Bingley, 2017 SCC 12, [2017] 1 SCR 170, 407 DLR (4th) 384, 345 CCC (3d) 306 R v Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13, [2010] 1 SCR 411 R v Dooley, 2009 ONCA 910, 249 CCC (3d) 449 R......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT