R. v. Blumenthal,
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | James L. Chipman |
| Neutral Citation | 2019 NSSC 35 |
| Date | 29 January 2019 |
| Citation | 2019 NSSC 35 |
| Docket Number | 464566 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Surette, 2019 NSPC 46
...R. v. Cassie and Hackett, (2018) Dartmouth, NSPC (unreported); R. v. Lee, 2011 NSPC 81; R. v. Elmadani, 2015 NSPC; and R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35. [30] The Defence submits that given the mitigating factors of Mr. Surette’s guilty pleas and acceptance of responsibility, his positive Pre-......
-
R. v. Sypes, 2019 ONCJ 258
...also para. 11 of R. v. Scordino, 2019 ONSC 1977. 4c) The scheme is no longer valid [35] Note R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35, a judgment of Chipman J., at para. 36: “The Victim Fine Surcharge provision has been declared invalid as of December 14, 2018 and sho......
-
R. v. Slauenwhite,
...In regard to ancillary orders, the submission seeks that the Court consider, in keeping with the principles set out in R. v. Blumenthal 2019 NSSC 35, and Sponagle, that two Orders, combined, is appropriate for the purposes of achieving restitution. [30] A......
-
R. v. Gloade, 2019 NSPC 55
...in determining the time in which the fine is to be paid: para. 81. [143] As Justice Chipman stated in R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35, at paras. 43-45: 43 Where a fine in lieu of forfeiture of proceeds of crime is ordered, any payments made pursuant to the fine should be cr......
4 cases
-
R. v. Surette, 2019 NSPC 46
...R. v. Cassie and Hackett, (2018) Dartmouth, NSPC (unreported); R. v. Lee, 2011 NSPC 81; R. v. Elmadani, 2015 NSPC; and R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35. [30] The Defence submits that given the mitigating factors of Mr. Surette’s guilty pleas and acceptance of responsibility, his positive Pre-......
-
R. v. Sypes, 2019 ONCJ 258
...also para. 11 of R. v. Scordino, 2019 ONSC 1977. 4c) The scheme is no longer valid [35] Note R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35, a judgment of Chipman J., at para. 36: “The Victim Fine Surcharge provision has been declared invalid as of December 14, 2018 and sho......
-
R. v. Gloade, 2019 NSPC 55
...in determining the time in which the fine is to be paid: para. 81. [143] As Justice Chipman stated in R. v. Blumenthal, 2019 NSSC 35, at paras. 43-45: 43 Where a fine in lieu of forfeiture of proceeds of crime is ordered, any payments made pursuant to the fine should be cr......
-
R. v. Slauenwhite,
...In regard to ancillary orders, the submission seeks that the Court consider, in keeping with the principles set out in R. v. Blumenthal 2019 NSSC 35, and Sponagle, that two Orders, combined, is appropriate for the purposes of achieving restitution. [30] A......