R. v. Bradshaw (R.D.N.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2025
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Greyell, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2025,2012 BCSC 2025,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2025 (SC) |
Date | 10 October 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35
...statement — into evidence. III. Decisions Below [16] Following a voir dire, Greyell J. admitted the re-enactment video into evidence (2012 BCSC 2025). He found that this hearsay statement was necessary and sufficiently reliable to be admitted. In finding that the statement was sufficiently ......
-
R. v. Larue, 2018 YKCA 9
...her, and that Ms. Asp was motivated by money and manipulated and lied to them in return. [33] The trial judge relied on R. v. Bradshaw, 2012 BCSC 2025 to guide his analysis on whether to admit, as hearsay evidence, recordings derived from a Mr. Big operation. Bradshaw was overturned by the ......
-
R. v. Bradshaw (R.D.N.), (2015) 372 B.C.A.C. 77 (CA)
...under the principled exception to the hearsay rule. The trial judge admitted the re-enactment, and his reasons are indexed at 2012 BCSC 2025. Mr. Bradshaw testified, denying any involvement in the murders and claiming that his inculpatory statements were part of a role play that Mr. Thielen......
3 cases
-
R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35
...statement — into evidence. III. Decisions Below [16] Following a voir dire, Greyell J. admitted the re-enactment video into evidence (2012 BCSC 2025). He found that this hearsay statement was necessary and sufficiently reliable to be admitted. In finding that the statement was sufficiently ......
-
R. v. Larue, 2018 YKCA 9
...her, and that Ms. Asp was motivated by money and manipulated and lied to them in return. [33] The trial judge relied on R. v. Bradshaw, 2012 BCSC 2025 to guide his analysis on whether to admit, as hearsay evidence, recordings derived from a Mr. Big operation. Bradshaw was overturned by the ......
-
R. v. Bradshaw (R.D.N.), (2015) 372 B.C.A.C. 77 (CA)
...under the principled exception to the hearsay rule. The trial judge admitted the re-enactment, and his reasons are indexed at 2012 BCSC 2025. Mr. Bradshaw testified, denying any involvement in the murders and claiming that his inculpatory statements were part of a role play that Mr. Thielen......