R. v. Brammall
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | S.A.Q. Akhtar J. |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 7334 |
| Date | 17 December 2019 |
| Docket Number | CR-19-10000476-0000 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Garofoli Review
...but at least it deals with the jurisdictional problem identiied in Laws . 198 See e.g. Arviko , supra note 193 at para 16; R v Brammall , 2019 ONSC 7334 at para 19; R v Reid , 2017 ONSC 3234 at para 12; R v Debartolo , 2018 ONSC 916 at para 13; R v Chor-Yin Choi , 2013 ONSC 291 at para 11; ......
-
Table of Cases
...440-42, 590-91, 619 Brady and Brady , R v , 2018 ONSC 1605 ......................................................... 628 Brammall , R v , 2019 ONSC 7334 ............................................................... 629 Branton , R v , 2001 CanLII 8535, 53 OR (3d) 737 (CA) ......................
-
R. v. Hafizi
...communications could assist in the investigation of the offences. See also R. v. Brown, 2019 ONSC 5615, at paras. 63, 66; R. v. Brammall, 2019 ONSC 7334, at para. 75; and R. v. Montgomery, 2016 BCCA 379, 341 C.C.C. (3d) 147, at paras. 81, 91. I adopt that terminology as a nice summary of th......
-
R. v. Abudu
...communications could assist in the investigation of the offences. See also R. v. Brown, 2019 ONSC 5615, at paras. 63, 66; R. v. Brammall, 2019 ONSC 7334, at para. 75; and R. v. Montgomery (2016), 341 C.C.C. (3d) 147, at paras. 81, 91 (B.C.C.A). I adopt that terminology as a nice summary of ......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
R. v. Alakoozi
...that the interception of that person’s private communications may assist in the investigation of an offence: R. v. Brammall, 2019 ONSC 7334, at para. [233]   As Akhtar, J. has recently summarized in R. v. Brammall, supra, at para. 75: “The question for the reviewing ......
-
R. v. Badroe
...in this case, such as videos, tattoos, clothing and hand gestures (R. v. Evans, 2013 ONSC 2447, 304 C.C.C. (3d) 212; R. v. Brammall, 2019 ONSC 7334; R. v. Charles et al. (16 August 2019), Toronto (Ont. C.J.)), the preliminary inquiry judge did not do so.  A review of his decision indic......
-
R. v. Robinson
...A more fulsome factual background to Project Patton may be found in the judgment of R. v. Brammall, 2019 ONSC 7334, where the issued warrants were the subject of an unsuccessful attack by other named targets. [4]           Here, the applican......
2 books & journal articles
-
Garofoli Review
...but at least it deals with the jurisdictional problem identiied in Laws . 198 See e.g. Arviko , supra note 193 at para 16; R v Brammall , 2019 ONSC 7334 at para 19; R v Reid , 2017 ONSC 3234 at para 12; R v Debartolo , 2018 ONSC 916 at para 13; R v Chor-Yin Choi , 2013 ONSC 291 at para 11; ......
-
Table of Cases
...440-42, 590-91, 619 Brady and Brady , R v , 2018 ONSC 1605 ......................................................... 628 Brammall , R v , 2019 ONSC 7334 ............................................................... 629 Branton , R v , 2001 CanLII 8535, 53 OR (3d) 737 (CA) ......................
