R. v. Buffalo (M.D.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 742

JudgeRosborough, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateOctober 05, 2009
Citations[2009] A.R. Uned. 742;[2009] A.R. Uned. 742 (PC);2009 ABPC 317
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Buffalo (M.D.), 2010 ABQB 325
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 23, 2010
    ...of the Criminal Code . The learned trial judge's three related decisions are found at 480 A.R. 268; 2009 ABPC 261, [2009] A.R. Uned. 742; 2009 ABPC 317 and [2009] A.R. Uned. 743; 2009 ABPC 318. [2] The Appellant submits that the trial judge erred in finding that the certificate of analyses ......
  • R. v. Gross (G.W.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 736 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2012
    ...whether a seizure of breath samples such as that effected by the police in this case was authorized by law. See: R. v. Buffalo , 2009 ABPC 317, at paras.38-48. I will not repeat that review in these reasons. I note that the general propositions outlined in that analysis have not been altere......
  • R. v. L'Hirondelle (C.), (2011) 521 A.R. 293 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 15, 2011
    ...1 S.C.R. 456; 373 N.R. 67; 432 A.R. 1; 424 W.A.C. 1; 2008 SCC 18, refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Buffalo (M.D.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 742; 2009 ABPC 317, refd to. [para. R. v. Do (H.N.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 339; 2009 ABPC 99, refd to. [para. 43]. R. v. Caruth (R.K.) (2004), 360 A.R. 246; 2004 ABQB 4......
  • R. v. Coughlin (D.D.), [2011] A.R. Uned. 877
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 30, 2011
    ...determine whether a seizure of breath samples such as that effected by the police in this case was authorized by law in R. v. Buffalo , 2009 ABPC 317, at paras.38-48. I will not repeat that review in these reasons. I note that the general propositions outlined in that analysis have not been......
4 cases
  • R. v. Buffalo (M.D.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 23, 2010
    ...of the Criminal Code . The learned trial judge's three related decisions are found at 480 A.R. 268; 2009 ABPC 261, [2009] A.R. Uned. 742; 2009 ABPC 317 and [2009] A.R. Uned. 743; 2009 ABPC 318. [2] The Appellant submits that the trial judge erred in finding that the certificate of analyses ......
  • R. v. Gross (G.W.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 736 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2012
    ...whether a seizure of breath samples such as that effected by the police in this case was authorized by law. See: R. v. Buffalo , 2009 ABPC 317, at paras.38-48. I will not repeat that review in these reasons. I note that the general propositions outlined in that analysis have not been altere......
  • R. v. L'Hirondelle (C.), (2011) 521 A.R. 293 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 15, 2011
    ...1 S.C.R. 456; 373 N.R. 67; 432 A.R. 1; 424 W.A.C. 1; 2008 SCC 18, refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Buffalo (M.D.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 742; 2009 ABPC 317, refd to. [para. R. v. Do (H.N.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 339; 2009 ABPC 99, refd to. [para. 43]. R. v. Caruth (R.K.) (2004), 360 A.R. 246; 2004 ABQB 4......
  • R. v. Coughlin (D.D.), [2011] A.R. Uned. 877
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 30, 2011
    ...determine whether a seizure of breath samples such as that effected by the police in this case was authorized by law in R. v. Buffalo , 2009 ABPC 317, at paras.38-48. I will not repeat that review in these reasons. I note that the general propositions outlined in that analysis have not been......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT