R. v. C.J.,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeELSON J.
Neutral Citation2020 SKQB 318
Docket NumberCRM 18 of 2020
Citation2020 SKQB 318
Date04 December 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Sium,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Septiembre 2022
    ...most of the alleged sexual assault and she recalled those events. So this is not the same factual situation as considered in R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318 [C.J.], where the complainant admitted there were times she had no memory of anything, which the court described as “memory gaps, assoc......
  • R. v. D.E.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 Febrero 2022
    ...2021 SKQB 308; R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.]; R v Al‑Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th) 62; R v Vandewater, 2020 SKQB 55; and R v Panasiuk, 2019 SKQB [44]     &#......
  • R v. Neil,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2022
    ...371 CCC (3d) 225; and R v Fogah, 2018 ONCA 564, 362 CCC (3d) 4. In this Court, the relevant line of cases continues with R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th) 62; R v Vandewater, 2020 SKQB 55, and R v Panasiuk, 2019 SKQB 258. Although the specific wording of......
  • R. v. Mintuck,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2021
    ...support the evidence of either participant in the encounter.   [31]        The case of R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318 cited by the defence is another Saskatchewan case that analyzes the law of sexual assault, and makes limited reference to the concept of hon......
4 cases
  • R v Sium,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Septiembre 2022
    ...most of the alleged sexual assault and she recalled those events. So this is not the same factual situation as considered in R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318 [C.J.], where the complainant admitted there were times she had no memory of anything, which the court described as “memory gaps, assoc......
  • R. v. D.E.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 Febrero 2022
    ...2021 SKQB 308; R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.]; R v Al‑Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th) 62; R v Vandewater, 2020 SKQB 55; and R v Panasiuk, 2019 SKQB [44]     &#......
  • R v. Neil,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2022
    ...371 CCC (3d) 225; and R v Fogah, 2018 ONCA 564, 362 CCC (3d) 4. In this Court, the relevant line of cases continues with R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th) 62; R v Vandewater, 2020 SKQB 55, and R v Panasiuk, 2019 SKQB 258. Although the specific wording of......
  • R. v. Mintuck,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2021
    ...support the evidence of either participant in the encounter.   [31]        The case of R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318 cited by the defence is another Saskatchewan case that analyzes the law of sexual assault, and makes limited reference to the concept of hon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT