R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeRichards C.J.S., Barrington-Foote and Kalmakoff JJ.A.
Citation2019 SKCA 90
Date18 September 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACR3154
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • R v K.D.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 28, 2021
    ...succinctly summarized the principles to apply when assessing the Crown’s obligation to preserve relevant evidence: R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at paras 27 to 29, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart]. Of those principles, the following are germane to this appeal: (a)    ......
  • POTOREYKO v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 10, 2021
    ...The Court of Appeal has provided direction on this question in R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart] and R v Crowe, 2021 SKCA 66 [21]                In Cathcart, Kalmakoff J.A. for the court comment......
  • R v Yates,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 17, 2023
    ...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” ( R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of error......
  • R v Yates,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 17, 2023
    ...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” (R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • R v K.D.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 28, 2021
    ...succinctly summarized the principles to apply when assessing the Crown’s obligation to preserve relevant evidence: R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at paras 27 to 29, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart]. Of those principles, the following are germane to this appeal: (a)    ......
  • POTOREYKO v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 10, 2021
    ...The Court of Appeal has provided direction on this question in R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart] and R v Crowe, 2021 SKCA 66 [21]                In Cathcart, Kalmakoff J.A. for the court comment......
  • R v Yates,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 17, 2023
    ...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” ( R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of error......
  • R v Yates,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 17, 2023
    ...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” (R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT