R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Richards C.J.S., Barrington-Foote and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
Citation | 2019 SKCA 90 |
Date | 18 September 2019 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Docket Number | CACR3154 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
R v K.D.S.,
...succinctly summarized the principles to apply when assessing the Crown’s obligation to preserve relevant evidence: R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at paras 27 to 29, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart]. Of those principles, the following are germane to this appeal: (a) ......
-
POTOREYKO v. R.,
...The Court of Appeal has provided direction on this question in R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart] and R v Crowe, 2021 SKCA 66 [21] In Cathcart, Kalmakoff J.A. for the court comment......
-
R v Yates,
...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” ( R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of error......
-
R v Yates,
...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” (R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of e......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
R v K.D.S.,
...succinctly summarized the principles to apply when assessing the Crown’s obligation to preserve relevant evidence: R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at paras 27 to 29, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart]. Of those principles, the following are germane to this appeal: (a) ......
-
POTOREYKO v. R.,
...The Court of Appeal has provided direction on this question in R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90, 380 CCC (3d) 357 [Cathcart] and R v Crowe, 2021 SKCA 66 [21] In Cathcart, Kalmakoff J.A. for the court comment......
-
R v Yates,
...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” ( R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of error......
-
R v Yates,
...the provision is applicable, and satisfying the court that the conviction should stand, notwithstanding the error” (R v Cathcart, 2019 SKCA 90 at para 84, 380 CCC (3d) 357). In R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 SCR 716, the Supreme Court identified the following two categories of e......
Request a trial to view additional results