R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Catherine Fraser,The Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 132 |
| Date | 06 April 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1601-0344-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...22. 35 Ibid. 36 See, e.g., R v Marquard (1993), 25 CR (4th) 1 (SCC). 37 R v W(R) , [1992] 2 SCR 122 at para 23 [ W(R) ]; R v Chahal , 2018 ABCA 132 at paras 52–53. 38 W(R) , above note 37 at 132–34. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 678 show the untrustworthy witness is telling the truth. 39 That indepen......
-
Table of cases
...367 R v Chafe, 2019 ONCA 113 ................................................................................ 679 R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132 ............................................................................... 677 THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 720 R v Chambers, [1990] 2 SCR 1293 .................
-
R v DSC, 2018 ABCA 335
...12, 2017. [2] The respondent testified at trial and denied the offences. His appeal from conviction was dismissed by this Court at 2018 ABCA 132, 361 CCC (3d) 39. Sentence was imposed on December 13, 2016. The sentencing judge imposed a global sentence of imprisonment for two years, organiz......
-
R v KRR, 2020 ABCA 475
...a judge made rule of evidence, has application to any of the sexual offences listed in s 274 of the Criminal Code: see R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132 at paras 52-53, as well as s 246.4 (now s 274 (as amended)), which was proclaimed on January 4, 1983, six months after Vetrovec was released on Ma......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
R v DSC, 2018 ABCA 335
...12, 2017. [2] The respondent testified at trial and denied the offences. His appeal from conviction was dismissed by this Court at 2018 ABCA 132, 361 CCC (3d) 39. Sentence was imposed on December 13, 2016. The sentencing judge imposed a global sentence of imprisonment for two years, organiz......
-
R v Churchill, 2018 ABQB 353
...material. I also find that this issue of location is not “an essential element of the offence or crucial to the defence” (see R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132; R v P(MB), [1994] 1 SCR 555, 89 CCC (3d) 289 and R v B(G) at paras 37 & 44); trial fairness was not compromised (see Chahal at para 38......
-
R v KRR, 2020 ABCA 475
...a judge made rule of evidence, has application to any of the sexual offences listed in s 274 of the Criminal Code: see R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132 at paras 52-53, as well as s 246.4 (now s 274 (as amended)), which was proclaimed on January 4, 1983, six months after Vetrovec was released on Ma......
2 books & journal articles
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...22. 35 Ibid. 36 See, e.g., R v Marquard (1993), 25 CR (4th) 1 (SCC). 37 R v W(R) , [1992] 2 SCR 122 at para 23 [ W(R) ]; R v Chahal , 2018 ABCA 132 at paras 52–53. 38 W(R) , above note 37 at 132–34. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 678 show the untrustworthy witness is telling the truth. 39 That indepen......
-
Table of cases
...367 R v Chafe, 2019 ONCA 113 ................................................................................ 679 R v Chahal, 2018 ABCA 132 ............................................................................... 677 THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 720 R v Chambers, [1990] 2 SCR 1293 .................