R v Chapman

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Kalmakoff,The Honourable Madam Justice Jackson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell
Citation2020 SKCA 11
Docket NumberCACR3226
Date04 February 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
42 practice notes
  • R. v. Beaver
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
  • R. v. Fox
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 6, 2026
    ...(3d) 151; Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189; R. v. Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24; R. v. White, 2015 ONCA 508, 127 O.R. (3d) 32; R. v. Buchanan, 2020 ONCA 245, 150 O.R. (3d) 209; Smith v. Jones, [1999] ......
  • Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp......
  • Reasonable Grounds to Suspect and Reasonable Grounds to Believe
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)......
  • Get Started for Free
30 cases
  • R. v. Beaver
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
  • R v Lichtenwald
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 10, 2020
    ...Grant at para 226; R v Arnault, 2019 SKCA 109 at paras 78–79 [Arnault]; R v Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69 at para 67, 365 CCC (3d) 91; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 38, 60 CR (7th) 273 [Chapman]; Kossick at para 20. The reference to an “unreasonable finding” is to an error in the trial judge’s f......
  • R. v. Hayatibahar
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 24, 2022
    ...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc......
  • R v Santos
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 19, 2022
    ...the standard of palpable and overriding error (R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at para 44, [2011] 3 SCR 215 [Côté]; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 27, 386 CCC (3d) 24 [Chapman]). Whether the facts as found by the trial judge amount to reasonable grounds for a warrantless arrest......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ...............................................
  • Reasonable Grounds to Suspect and Reasonable Grounds to Believe
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ................................... 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 Chapman , R v , 2020 SKCA 11 ............................................. 260, 272 Charette , R v , 2009 ONCA 310 ................................................ 154 Ch......
  • Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp......