R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Kalmakoff,The Honourable Madam Justice Jackson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 11 |
| Date | 04 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR3226 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
-
R. v. Hayatibahar,
...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc......
-
GOODMAN v. R., 2020 SKQB 45
...a trial judge’s refusal to exclude evidence under s. 24(2). [6] A recent articulation of the appropriate standard is found in R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11[Chapman] where Kalmakoff J.A. held, at para. [38] The decision to admit or exclude evidence under s. 24(2) of the Charter is a question of ......
-
R v Macfie,
...judge amount to reasonable grounds to arrest or make a breath sample demand, are reviewable on the correctness standard. See: R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 37, 386 CCC (3d) 24; Shepherd at para 20. A subsequent appeal to this Court can only be pursued on a question of law and, therefore......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
-
R. v. Hayatibahar,
...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc......
-
GOODMAN v. R., 2020 SKQB 45
...a trial judge’s refusal to exclude evidence under s. 24(2). [6] A recent articulation of the appropriate standard is found in R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11[Chapman] where Kalmakoff J.A. held, at para. [38] The decision to admit or exclude evidence under s. 24(2) of the Charter is a question of ......
-
R v Santos,
...the standard of palpable and overriding error (R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at para 44, [2011] 3 SCR 215 [Côté]; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 27, 386 CCC (3d) 24 [Chapman]). Whether the facts as found by the trial judge amount to reasonable grounds for a warrantless arrest......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ...............................................
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp......