R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Kalmakoff,The Honourable Madam Justice Jackson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 11 |
| Date | 04 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR3226 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
36 practice notes
-
R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp......
-
Table of cases
...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ...............................................
-
Reasonable Grounds to Suspect and Reasonable Grounds to Believe
...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)......
Get Started for Free
32 cases
-
R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
...2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, 131 O.R. (3d) 643; R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11, 386 C.C.C. (3d) 24. By Martin J. (dissenting) R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33......
-
R v Singer,
...12, 412 CCC (3d) 147 [ Tim SC], and citing R v Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 SCR 202. See also Moyles at paras 69–71; and R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at paras 101–105, 386 CCC (3d) 89 R v Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, 475 DLR (4th) 575 [ Beaver], summarized the first branch of the Grant analysis in ......
-
R. v. Hayatibahar, 2022 ONSC 1281
...to believe” – does not require proof on the balance of probabilities, much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” [134] In R. v. Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para. 65, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held “The jurisprudence is consistent that “probability”, in this sense, does not mean “balanc......
-
R v Santos, 2022 SKCA 50
...the standard of palpable and overriding error (R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at para 44, [2011] 3 SCR 215 [Côté]; R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 at para 27, 386 CCC (3d) 24 [Chapman]). Whether the facts as found by the trial judge amount to reasonable grounds for a warrantless arrest......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...or ‘not unlikely,’ do [ sic ] 415 R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3 [ Glendinning ][emphasis in original], and R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65 [ Chapman ], respectively. For other decisions saying that the standard does not require proof on balance of probabilities, see R v Sp......
-
Table of cases
...160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... 105, 111, 112, 115 R v Charles, 2012 SKCA 34 ...............................................
-
Reasonable Grounds to Suspect and Reasonable Grounds to Believe
...to ABCA), af’d 2011 SCC 21 at paras 4, 5; Desilva , supra note 24 at para 57; R v Glendinning , 2019 BCCA 365 at para 3; R v Chapman , 2020 SKCA 11 at para 65. 68 R v Lambert , infra note 226 at para 86. See also R v Hason , 2024 ONCA 369 at para 36. 69 Beaver , infra note 127 at para 72(6)......
-
Table of Cases
................................... 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 Chapman , R v , 2020 SKCA 11 ............................................. 260, 272 Charette , R v , 2009 ONCA 310 ................................................ 154 Ch......