R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel |
| Date | 24 January 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45605; CA45614 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Triolo,
...since a conviction of the underlying offence of aiding an assault requires the aider to have the specific intent to assist: R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24, at para. 57-58. But in Mr. Lozada’s case, the defence of intoxication has no air of reality. For an air of reality to exist th......
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 157
...Louie was allowed and his conviction set aside; the appellant’s conviction appeal was dismissed. Reasons of this Court are indexed as 2020 BCCA 24. [4] Mr. Charlie appeals the sentence imposed. He 1. The sentencing judge erred in law by over‑emphasizing the principles of deterrence, protect......
-
R. v. Gill, 2021 BCSC 332
...the verdict is one that a properly instructed jury or judge could reasonably have rendered: R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22; R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24 at [7] In R.P., the Supreme Court of Canada found, at para. 10: Where......
3 cases
-
R. v. Triolo,
...since a conviction of the underlying offence of aiding an assault requires the aider to have the specific intent to assist: R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24, at para. 57-58. But in Mr. Lozada’s case, the defence of intoxication has no air of reality. For an air of reality to exist th......
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 157
...Louie was allowed and his conviction set aside; the appellant’s conviction appeal was dismissed. Reasons of this Court are indexed as 2020 BCCA 24. [4] Mr. Charlie appeals the sentence imposed. He 1. The sentencing judge erred in law by over‑emphasizing the principles of deterrence, protect......
-
R. v. Gill, 2021 BCSC 332
...the verdict is one that a properly instructed jury or judge could reasonably have rendered: R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22; R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24 at [7] In R.P., the Supreme Court of Canada found, at para. 10: Where......