R. v. Chartrand

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeHonourable Judge Ronda van der Hoek
Citation2020 NSPC 26
Date02 March 2020
CourtProvincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Docket Number8296683, 8296684

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • 2025 BCSC 57
    • Canada
    • 1 January 2025
    ...patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow the requirements for the provi......
  • Sikora v Deputy Director Community Safety Unit
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 January 2025
    ...patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow the requirements for the provi......
2 cases
  • 2025 BCSC 57,
    • Canada
    • 1 January 2025
    ...patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow the requirements for the provi......
  • Sikora v Deputy Director Community Safety Unit,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 January 2025
    ...patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow the requirements for the provi......