R. v. Cholach (B.) et al., [2006] A.R. Uned. 695 (PC)

JudgeMalin, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Citation[2006] A.R. Uned. 695 (PC),[2006] A.R. Uned. 695,2006 ABPC 304
Date01 November 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Bertrand, 2021 ABPC 111
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Marzo 2021
    ...and acquitted because the evidence did not prove that the director was involved in the management of the property, see: R. v. Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304. ...
  • R v George, 2018 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2018
    ...from Mr. Pervez as a sign of good faith/down payment” for the housing premises; (i) In contrast to Mr. Barret in my decision R v Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304, there is evidence that at least until December 2015, George on behalf of Advanced had control and management of the premises, he set foot ......
2 cases
  • R. v. Bertrand, 2021 ABPC 111
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Marzo 2021
    ...and acquitted because the evidence did not prove that the director was involved in the management of the property, see: R. v. Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304. ...
  • R v George, 2018 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2018
    ...from Mr. Pervez as a sign of good faith/down payment” for the housing premises; (i) In contrast to Mr. Barret in my decision R v Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304, there is evidence that at least until December 2015, George on behalf of Advanced had control and management of the premises, he set foot ......