R. v. Cholach (B.) et al., [2006] A.R. Uned. 695 (PC)

JudgeMalin, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterTRADE REGULATION,COMPANY LAW,PRACTICE,POLLUTION CONTROL
Citation[2006] A.R. Uned. 695 (PC),[2006] A.R. Uned. 695,2006 ABPC 304
Date01 November 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Bertrand,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...and acquitted because the evidence did not prove that the director was involved in the management of the property, see: R. v. Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304. ...
  • R v George, 2018 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 26, 2018
    ...from Mr. Pervez as a sign of good faith/down payment” for the housing premises; (i) In contrast to Mr. Barret in my decision R v Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304, there is evidence that at least until December 2015, George on behalf of Advanced had control and management of the premises, he set foot ......
2 cases
  • R. v. Bertrand,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...and acquitted because the evidence did not prove that the director was involved in the management of the property, see: R. v. Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304. ...
  • R v George, 2018 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 26, 2018
    ...from Mr. Pervez as a sign of good faith/down payment” for the housing premises; (i) In contrast to Mr. Barret in my decision R v Cholach, 2006 ABPC 304, there is evidence that at least until December 2015, George on behalf of Advanced had control and management of the premises, he set foot ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT