R. v. Colbourne (R.L.), (2002) 331 A.R. 365 (PC)

JudgeSemenuk, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateOctober 17, 2002
Citations(2002), 331 A.R. 365 (PC);2002 ABPC 141

R. v. Colbourne (R.L.) (2002), 331 A.R. 365 (PC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] A.R. TBEd. MR.058

Her Majesty the Queen v. Ricky Lloyd Colbourne

(017395476P10101; 2002 ABPC 141)

Indexed as: R. v. Colbourne (R.L.)

Alberta Provincial Court

Semenuk, P.C.J.

October 17, 2002.

Summary:

The accused pleaded guilty to one charge of committing perjury.

The Alberta Provincial Court sentenced the accused to 90 days' imprisonment to be served intermittently.

Criminal Law - Topic 5720.4

Punishments (sentence) - Conditional sentence - When available or appropriate - The 38 year old accused was charged with violating a City bylaw - It was alleged that his dog bit a neighbour - At trial, the accused swore under oath that the dog did not belong to him and that he believed that the dog did not have the propensity to bite - The accused was acquitted - The police became aware that the dog was, in fact, the accused's dog - The accused pleaded guilty to perjury - The Alberta Provincial Court held that a conditional sentence would be inappropriate, given the gravity of the offence of perjury and the accused's refusal to take responsibility for his actions - See paragraphs 18 to 24.

Criminal Law - Topic 5900

Sentence - Perjury and giving contradictory evidence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5720.4 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5900

Sentence - Perjury and giving contradictory evidence - The accused was charged with violating a City bylaw - It was alleged that his dog bit a neighbour - At trial, the accused testified that the dog did not belong to him and that he believed that the dog did not have the propensity to bite - The accused was acquitted because the injury was not proved to be a bite as opposed to a scratch - The police became aware that the dog was, in fact, the accused's dog - The accused pleaded guilty to perjury - He refused to acknowledge his wrongdoing in the offence -The accused had a prior record - The Alberta Provincial Court sentenced the accused to 90 days' imprisonment to be served intermittently.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Turner (1981), 14 Sask.R. 321; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 335 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. Brown (1984), 53 A.R. 1 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. Boross (1984), 53 A.R. 257; 12 C.C.C.(3d) 480 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. Jordan and Sager (1986), 72 A.R. 167 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. Van Straten (S.D.) (1994), 157 A.R. 190; 77 W.A.C. 190 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. Saltman (G.) (1995), 163 A.R. 338 (Prov. Ct.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. MacDougall (J.L.) (2000), 188 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 167; 569 A.P.R. 167 (P.E.I.T.D.), consd. [para. 5].

R. v. McDonnell (T.E.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948; 210 N.R. 241; 196 A.R. 321; 141 W.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Proulx (J.K.D.) (2000), 249 N.R. 201; 142 Man.R. (2d) 161; 212 W.A.C. 161; 140 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 14].

Counsel:

L.R. Grieve, for the Crown;

C.R. Stewart, for the accused.

This matter was heard before Semenuk, P.C.J., of the Alberta Provincial Court, who delivered the following reasons for sentence on October 17, 2002.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT