R. v. Collymore (L.) et al., [2002] O.T.C. 13 (SupCt)

• Judge: Beaulieu, J.
• Court: Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
• Case Date: January 11, 2002
• Jurisdiction: Ontario
• Citations: [2002] O.T.C. 13 (SupCt)

R. v. Collymore (L.), [2002] O.T.C. 13 (SupCt)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] O.T.C. TBEd. JA.046

Her Majesty the Queen (appellant) v. Lawrence Collymore, Kevin Gayle and Maxine Nugent (respondents)

(F1095/94)

Indexed As: R. v. Collymore (L.) et al.

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

Beaulieu, J.

January 11, 2002.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Civil Rights - Topic 1508

Property - General principles - Expectation of privacy - See paragraphs 1 to 158.

Civil Rights - Topic 1646

Property - Search and seizure - Unreasonable search and seizure defined - See paragraphs 1 to 158.

Civil Rights - Topic 1655

Property - Search and seizure - Warrantless search and seizure - Customs - See paragraphs 1 to 158.

Civil Rights - Topic 8368

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Denial of rights - Remedies - Exclusion of evidence - See paragraphs 159 to 201.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Simmons, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 495; 89 N.R. 1; 30 O.A.C. 241; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 296, refd to. [paras. 66].

R. v. MacKay (T.C.) et al. (1992), 134 A.R. 188 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 66].

R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; 74 N.R. 276; 56 C.R.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 76].

R. v. Mellenthin, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 615; 144 N.R. 50; 135 A.R. 1; 33 W.A.C. 1; 76 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. 79].

R. v. Caslake (T.L.), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51; 221 N.R. 281; 123 Man.R.(2d) 208; 159 W.A.C. 208; 121 C.C.C.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 88].

R. v. Wong et al., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36; 120 N.R. 34; 45 O.A.C. 250; 60 C.C.C.(3d) 460, refd to. [para. 96].

R. v. Duarte - see R. v. Sanelli, Duarte and Fasciano.

R. v. Sanelli, Duarte and Fasciano, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 30; 103 N.R. 86; 37 O.A.C. 322; 53 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 96].

United States of America v. Ramsay (1977), 431 U.S. 606 (U.S. Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 98].

R. v. Kokesch, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 3; 121 N.R. 161; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 207, refd to. [para. 100].

R. v. Fergusen - see R. v. Ferguson.

R. v. Ferguson (1990), 41 O.A.C. 149; 1 C.R.(4th) 53 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 100].

R. v. Hosie (G.) (1996), 91 O.A.C. 281; 107 C.C.C.(3d) 385 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 102].

R. v. Sutherland (M.) (2000), 139 O.A.C. 53; 150 C.C.C.(3d) 231 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 102].

R. v. Golden (I.V.) (2001), 279 N.R. 1; 153 O.A.C. 201 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 106].

Southam Inc. v. Hunter, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145; 55 N.R. 241; 55 A.R. 291; 14 C.C.C.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 117].

R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; 209 N.R. 81; 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 472 A.P.R. 1; 113 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 5 C.R.(5th) 1, refd to. [para. 167].

R. v. Monney (I.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 652; 237 N.R. 157; 119 O.A.C. 272, refd to. [para. 170].

R. v. Edwards (C.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128; 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [Appendix A].

R. v. Fry (R.L.) (1999), 183 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 346; 556 A.P.R. 346 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [Appendix A].

R. v. Sagliocco (1979), 51 C.C.C.(2d) 188 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Deakin (1912), 19 C.C.C. 274 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Welsh, [1950] S.C.R. 412; [1950] D.L.R. 641; 97 C.C.C. 177, refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Switzer (1985), 22 C.C.C.(3d) 60 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Akins (2000), 80 C.R.R.(2d) 143 (Ont. Sup. Ct.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Cole (1982), 2 C.C.C.(3d) 253 (Ont. Co. Ct.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Kennedy, [1983] W.C.D. 240 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [Appendix B].

R. v. Frattura (1987), 40 C.C.C.(3d) 379 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [Appendix B].

Statutes Noticed:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 8, sect. 24(2) [para. 1].

Counsel:

R. Covre, for the appellant;

P. Slansky, for Mr. Collymore;

J. Norris, for Ms. Nugent;

Mr. Gayle, appearing Pro se.

This application was heard on December 3-7, 2001, by Beaulieu, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on January 11, 2002.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.