R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14
| Judge | MacDonald |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2017 ABPC 14 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 12 April 2017 |
| Docket Number | 160211389P1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
2023 ABCJ 84,
...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
-
R v Prosper,
...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
-
R v King,
..._______________________________________________________ The Citation number has been corrected and changed from “R v King, 2017 ABPC 14” to “R v King, 2017 ABPC 144”, which is the correct citation number as stated in the DECISIA Judgment Citation...
3 cases
-
2023 ABCJ 84,
...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
-
R v Prosper,
...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
-
R v King,
..._______________________________________________________ The Citation number has been corrected and changed from “R v King, 2017 ABPC 14” to “R v King, 2017 ABPC 144”, which is the correct citation number as stated in the DECISIA Judgment Citation...