R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14

JudgeMacDonald
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Citation2017 ABPC 14
Date12 April 2017
Docket Number160211389P1

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • 2023 ABCJ 84
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
  • R v Prosper
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • April 11, 2023
    ...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
  • R v King, 2017 ABPC 144
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 8, 2017
    ..._______________________________________________________   The Citation number has been corrected and changed from “R v King, 2017 ABPC 14” to “R v King, 2017 ABPC 144”, which is the correct citation number as stated in the DECISIA Judgment Citation...
2 cases
  • R v Prosper
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • April 11, 2023
    ...may or may not meet the Waterfield criteria. See for example R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 regarding a safety search of a home; see R v Comrie, 2017 ABPC 14 where I reviewed the law regarding the use of handcuffs during an investigative 65 Since I have found that Mr. Prosper was not handcuffed u......
  • R v King, 2017 ABPC 144
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 8, 2017
    ..._______________________________________________________   The Citation number has been corrected and changed from “R v King, 2017 ABPC 14” to “R v King, 2017 ABPC 144”, which is the correct citation number as stated in the DECISIA Judgment Citation...