R. v. D.L.W.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 43 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 43,2014 BCSC 43 |
| Date | 10 January 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 practice notes
-
Sentencing
...of bodily integrity. For instance, acts of penetration, anal sex, or oral sex are considered 105 R v Moors , 2006 ABPC 190. 106 R v DLW , 2014 BCSC 43 at para 89. See also R v F (GC) , 2004 CanLII 4771, 188 CCC (3d) 68 at para 21 (CA) ; R v Smith , [2017] NJ No 404 (QL) at para 31 (SC); R v......
-
Table of Cases
...198 DKDB , R v , 2013 BCSC 2321 ........................................................ 632 DLW , R v , 2014 BCSC 43 ........................................................... 636 DLW , R v , 2016 SCC 22 ........................................................ . 179, 181 DM , R v , [2002]......
-
R. v. Ralph (D.M.),
...or Grande Prairie, let alone elsewhere in Canada. VII. PRESENT-DAY SENTENCES FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN [52] In R. v. D.L.W. , 2014 BCSC 43 at para. 67, I noted that conditional sentences were rarely appropriate for persons convicted of sexual interference offences: [67] A long li......
-
R. v. Brewer (J.T.),
..., 2008 ONCA 287 at para. 4. Totality Principle [86] I recently summarized the law relating to the totality principle in R. v. D.L.W. , 2014 BCSC 43 at paras. 99-104. I will reiterate much of what was said in that case here. [87] A sentencing judge who orders an offender to serve consecutive......
Get Started for Free
17 cases
-
R. v. Ralph (D.M.),
...or Grande Prairie, let alone elsewhere in Canada. VII. PRESENT-DAY SENTENCES FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN [52] In R. v. D.L.W. , 2014 BCSC 43 at para. 67, I noted that conditional sentences were rarely appropriate for persons convicted of sexual interference offences: [67] A long li......
-
R. v. Brewer (J.T.),
..., 2008 ONCA 287 at para. 4. Totality Principle [86] I recently summarized the law relating to the totality principle in R. v. D.L.W. , 2014 BCSC 43 at paras. 99-104. I will reiterate much of what was said in that case here. [87] A sentencing judge who orders an offender to serve consecutive......
-
R. v. D.L.W.,
...he received a sentence of two years to run consecutively to sentences totalling 14 years imposed in relation to the other offences: 2014 BCSC 43. [6] The trial judge, Romilly J., found that the respondent first brought the family dog into the bedroom with the complainant when she was 15 or ......
-
R. v. D.L.W.,
...he received a sentence of two years to run consecutively to sentences totalling 14 years imposed in relation to the other offences: 2014 BCSC 43. [6] The trial judge, Romilly J., found that the respondent first brought the family dog into the bedroom with the complainant when she was 15 or ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Sentencing
...of bodily integrity. For instance, acts of penetration, anal sex, or oral sex are considered 105 R v Moors , 2006 ABPC 190. 106 R v DLW , 2014 BCSC 43 at para 89. See also R v F (GC) , 2004 CanLII 4771, 188 CCC (3d) 68 at para 21 (CA) ; R v Smith , [2017] NJ No 404 (QL) at para 31 (SC); R v......
-
Table of Cases
...198 DKDB , R v , 2013 BCSC 2321 ........................................................ 632 DLW , R v , 2014 BCSC 43 ........................................................... 636 DLW , R v , 2016 SCC 22 ........................................................ . 179, 181 DM , R v , [2002]......