R. v. D.L.B.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Butler,Goepel,Voith |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 15 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA47019 |
| Date | 18 January 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 438,
...of the offence, but regardless of their positions, the court must be satisfied that the requirements of s. 16(1) are met: R. v. D.L.B., 2022 BCCA 15, at para. 51 Two forensic psychiatrists gave opinion evidence. Dr. Shabehram Lohrasbe was called by Mr. Rashid, while Dr. Sam Iskander was cal......
-
R v Rashid,
...of the offence, but regardless of their positions, the court must be satisfied that the requirements of s. 16(1) are met: R. v. D.L.B., 2022 BCCA 15, at para. 51 Two forensic psychiatrists gave opinion evidence. Dr. Shabehram Lohrasbe was called by Mr. Rashid, while Dr. Sam Iskander was cal......
2 cases
-
2023 BCSC 438,
...of the offence, but regardless of their positions, the court must be satisfied that the requirements of s. 16(1) are met: R. v. D.L.B., 2022 BCCA 15, at para. 51 Two forensic psychiatrists gave opinion evidence. Dr. Shabehram Lohrasbe was called by Mr. Rashid, while Dr. Sam Iskander was cal......
-
R v Rashid,
...of the offence, but regardless of their positions, the court must be satisfied that the requirements of s. 16(1) are met: R. v. D.L.B., 2022 BCCA 15, at para. 51 Two forensic psychiatrists gave opinion evidence. Dr. Shabehram Lohrasbe was called by Mr. Rashid, while Dr. Sam Iskander was cal......