R. v. D.M., (1995) 136 Sask.R. 135 (QB)

JudgeDielschneider, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Case DateOctober 06, 1995
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations(1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (QB)

R. v. D.M. (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (QB)

MLB headnote and full text

Her Majesty The Queen v. D.M.

(1994 Q.B.C.N.J. No. 117)

Indexed As: R. v. D.M.

Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench

Judicial Centre of Saskatoon

Dielschneider, J.

October 6, 1995.

Summary:

An accused pleaded guilty to a breach of recognizance, aggravated assault, aggravated sexual assault, unlawful confinement, assault with a weapon and two counts of threatening to cause death. The Crown applied to have the accused declared a dangerous offender and to have him sentenced to serve an inde­terminate period of time.

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench allowed the application and sentenced the accused to an indeterminate term in a federal penitentiary. On two counts falling outside the ambit of a serious personal injury offence, the court sentenced the accused to a concurrent sentence of 90 days' imprison­ment.

Criminal Law - Topic 6505

Dangerous offenders - Detention - Appli­cation - General - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench reviewed Criminal Code provisions respecting an application to have an accused declared a dangerous offender - See paragraphs 4 to 16.

Criminal Law - Topic 6558

Dangerous offenders - Detention - Pro­tection of the public - Dangerous sexual offender - [See Criminal Law - Topic 6575 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 6575

Dangerous offenders - Detention - Sen­tencing - Sentence - An accused pleaded guilty to seven criminal offences com­mitted upon the person of the complainant, his former common law spouse, and his 2.5 month old son - The accused held the complainant and child in confinement - Raped the complainant - Incidents of torture included hanging the complainant and child and ripping open the complain­ant's vagina area and sewing her up with­out anaesthetic - After several hours, the complainant and child escaped - Criminal record of some 70 convictions, including a series of assaults and sexual assaults which emanate from and form part of a behaviourial pattern that has become in­creasingly violent, aggressive and belliger­ent - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench concluded that the accused was a dangerous offender and sentenced him to an indeterminate term in a federal peniten­tiary.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Carleton (1981), 32 A.R. 181; 69 C.C.C.(2d) 1 (C.A.), affd. [1983] 2 S.C.R. 58; 52 N.R. 293; 47 A.R. 160; 6 C.C.C.(3d) 480, refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Moore (1985), 7 O.A.C. 33; 16 C.C.C.(3d) 328 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Noyes, [1991] B.C.D. Crim. Conv. 5735-01; 1 B.C.A.C. 81; 1 W.A.C. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Jackson (1981), 46 N.S.R.(2d) 92; 89 A.P.R. 92; 61 C.C.C.(2d) 540 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Hall (1981), 32 A.R. 320; 63 C.C.C.(2d) 535 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1982), 42 N.R. 326; 35 A.R. 450 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. Milne (1982), 66 C.C.C.(2d) 544 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. Crosby (1982), 1 C.C.C.(3d) 233 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. Khan (A.), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 36].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 752 [para. 8]; sect. 753 [paras. 8, 14]; sect. 753(a)(i), sect. 753(a)(ii), sect. 753(a)(iii) [para. 9]; sect. 753(b) [para. 10].

Counsel:

M.K. Miazga, for the Crown;

E.S. Hopley, for the accused.

This application was heard before Dielschneider, J., of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Saska­toon, who delivered the following judgment orally on October 6, 1995.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Shrubsall (W.C.), 2001 NSSC 197
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 6, 2001
    ...512 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 228]. R. v. Moore (1985), 7 O.A.C. 33; 16 C.C.C.(3d) 328 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 253]. R. v. D.M. (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. R. v. Deckert (L.C.) (2001), 201 Sask.R. 161 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 255]. R. v. Hart (W.A.) (2001), 196 N.S.R.(2d) 3......
  • R. v. B.W.N.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • November 14, 2002
    ...beyond a reasonable doubt. Cases such as R. v. Moore (1985), 16 C.C.C.(3d) 328 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Dow (supra); R. v. M. (D.) (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Sask. Q.B.) and others have held that there is no residual discretion once the statutory requirements have been proven beyond a reasonable do......
  • R. v. L.F.A., (2007) 298 Sask.R. 1 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 15, 2007
    ...any psychological disorders which prevent him from understanding the need to change his behaviour. (See for example, R. v. M.(D.) (1995), 136 Sask. R. 135 (Q.B.), aff'd (1996), 148 Sask. R. 253 (CA), R. v. Green , [2003] 2 W.W.R. 446 (SKQB), and R. v. Brown , 2004 BCCA 416). Nor does he fac......
  • R. v. K.R.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 14, 2004
    ...to. [para. 51, footnote 31]. R. v. Nordstrom (K.A.), [2003] O.T.C. 284 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 51, footnote 32]. R. v. D.P.M. (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Q.B.), affd. (1996), 148 Sask.R. 253; 134 W.A.C. 253 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote R. v. W.G.B., [2004] 204 B.C.A.C. 3; 333 W.A.C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Shrubsall (W.C.), 2001 NSSC 197
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 6, 2001
    ...512 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 228]. R. v. Moore (1985), 7 O.A.C. 33; 16 C.C.C.(3d) 328 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 253]. R. v. D.M. (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. R. v. Deckert (L.C.) (2001), 201 Sask.R. 161 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 255]. R. v. Hart (W.A.) (2001), 196 N.S.R.(2d) 3......
  • R. v. B.W.N.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • November 14, 2002
    ...beyond a reasonable doubt. Cases such as R. v. Moore (1985), 16 C.C.C.(3d) 328 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Dow (supra); R. v. M. (D.) (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Sask. Q.B.) and others have held that there is no residual discretion once the statutory requirements have been proven beyond a reasonable do......
  • R. v. L.F.A., (2007) 298 Sask.R. 1 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 15, 2007
    ...any psychological disorders which prevent him from understanding the need to change his behaviour. (See for example, R. v. M.(D.) (1995), 136 Sask. R. 135 (Q.B.), aff'd (1996), 148 Sask. R. 253 (CA), R. v. Green , [2003] 2 W.W.R. 446 (SKQB), and R. v. Brown , 2004 BCCA 416). Nor does he fac......
  • R. v. K.R.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 14, 2004
    ...to. [para. 51, footnote 31]. R. v. Nordstrom (K.A.), [2003] O.T.C. 284 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 51, footnote 32]. R. v. D.P.M. (1995), 136 Sask.R. 135 (Q.B.), affd. (1996), 148 Sask.R. 253; 134 W.A.C. 253 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote R. v. W.G.B., [2004] 204 B.C.A.C. 3; 333 W.A.C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT