R. v. D.M.R., 2014 BCSC 63

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation2014 BCSC 63,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 63 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 63
Date17 January 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Detention and Arrest. Second Edition
    • June 22, 2017
    ...298 R v Dinh, 2001 ABPC 48 ......................................................................................98 R v DMR, 2014 BCSC 63 ............................................................................. 306, 326 R v Doell, 2007 SKCA 61 ................................................
  • The Impact of the Charter
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Detention and Arrest. Second Edition
    • June 22, 2017
    ...for his detention while he was making it impossible for them to do so. 112 R v Taylor , 2014 SCC 50 at para 24 [ Taylor ]. See R v DMR, 2014 BCSC 63 [ DMR ] for a useful review of circumstances that have been held to justify delay in some cases. The Impact of the Charter 309 Although initia......
  • R. v. Drummond, 2017 YKTC 63
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • December 13, 2017
    ...was not implemented as it should have been.[61]           Counsel relies on the case of R. v. D.M.R., 2014 BCSC 63 where Romilly J., in paras. 60-65, reviewed the legal authorities for the informational and implementational aspects of the s. 10(b) Charter right......
  • R. v. Mirhadi (B.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1877
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 17, 2014
    ...after midnight, 17 minutes after Cst. Nickerson was directed by Cst. Kershaw to place the accused under arrest. [19] In R. v. D.M.R. , 2014 BCSC 63, Mr. Justice Romilly, at para. 51, found the time requirements applying to implementation of the accused's right to counsel could be "......
2 cases
  • R. v. Drummond, 2017 YKTC 63
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • December 13, 2017
    ...was not implemented as it should have been.[61]           Counsel relies on the case of R. v. D.M.R., 2014 BCSC 63 where Romilly J., in paras. 60-65, reviewed the legal authorities for the informational and implementational aspects of the s. 10(b) Charter right......
  • R. v. Mirhadi (B.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1877
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 17, 2014
    ...after midnight, 17 minutes after Cst. Nickerson was directed by Cst. Kershaw to place the accused under arrest. [19] In R. v. D.M.R. , 2014 BCSC 63, Mr. Justice Romilly, at para. 51, found the time requirements applying to implementation of the accused's right to counsel could be "......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest. Second Edition
    • June 22, 2017
    ...298 R v Dinh, 2001 ABPC 48 ......................................................................................98 R v DMR, 2014 BCSC 63 ............................................................................. 306, 326 R v Doell, 2007 SKCA 61 ................................................
  • The Impact of the Charter
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest. Second Edition
    • June 22, 2017
    ...for his detention while he was making it impossible for them to do so. 112 R v Taylor , 2014 SCC 50 at para 24 [ Taylor ]. See R v DMR, 2014 BCSC 63 [ DMR ] for a useful review of circumstances that have been held to justify delay in some cases. The Impact of the Charter 309 Although initia......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT