R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Doherty, van Rensburg and Thorburn JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 514 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 514 |
| Docket Number | C64701 & C64827 |
| Date | 19 July 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Gaetan
...of appeal is that there was evidence that supported an acquittal. That is not enough. As Doherty J.A. observed in R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021 ONCA 514, at para. 45, leave to appeal refused, [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 356, “the existence of an evidentiary road leading to an acquittal does no......
-
R v Granados-Arana
...charge as a whole, in the context of the particular case, served its purpose by delivering the necessary message”: R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021 ONCA 514, at para. 112. See also R. v. Khela, 2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104, at paras. 13-15, 47; R. v. Vassel, 2018 ONCA 721, 365 C.C.C. (3d) 45,......
-
R. v. Grant
...from the exculpatory portions, the best course is to specifically refer the jury to the exculpatory portions. In R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021, ONCA 514, this court recalled, at paras. 108 to 118, that no mandatory formula applies since the instructions should be tailored to the specific circ......
-
R v Smoke
...there was some exculpatory evidence adduced at trial, it did not undermine the reasonableness of the verdict. In R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021 ONCA 514, leave to appeal refused, [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 356, Doherty J.A. said, at para. 46: When a verdict is said to be unreasonable, the question is......
2 cases
-
R. v. Grant
...from the exculpatory portions, the best course is to specifically refer the jury to the exculpatory portions. In R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021, ONCA 514, this court recalled, at paras. 108 to 118, that no mandatory formula applies since the instructions should be tailored to the specific circ......
-
R. v. Smoke
...there was some exculpatory evidence adduced at trial, it did not undermine the reasonableness of the verdict. In R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab, 2021 ONCA 514, leave to appeal refused, [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 356, Doherty J.A. said, at para. When a verdict is said to be unreasonable, the question is not......
