R. v. Dallas (S.G.), [2002] B.C.T.C. 760 (SC)
| Judge | Curtis, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | May 17, 2002 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2002] B.C.T.C. 760 (SC);2002 BCSC 760 |
R. v. Dallas (S.G.), [2002] B.C.T.C. 760 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. OC.026
Regina (respondent) v. Sidney Gordon Dallas, Gregory James Hinchcliffe and John Terezakis (applicants)
(CC991475; 2002 BCSC 760)
Indexed As: R. v. Dallas (S.G.) et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Curtis, J.
May 17, 2002.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Civil Rights - Topic 3107
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Void for vagueness doctrine - See paragraph 29.
Civil Rights - Topic 3107.2
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Overbreadth principle - See paragraph 29.
Civil Rights - Topic 3157.2
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Police or prosecutorial agents - See paragraphs 1 to 30 and 91 to 120.
Narcotic Control - Topic 5
General - Legislation - General - See paragraphs 1 to 30 and 91 to 120.
Narcotic Control - Topic 726
Offences - Trafficking - Undercover participation - Effect of - See paragraphs 1 to 30 and 91 to 120.
Police - Topic 3115
Powers - Investigation - Illegal police activity - Effect of - See paragraphs 1 to 30 and 91 to 120.
Counsel:
Chris Greenwood, for the Crown;
David Martin, for Sidney Gordon Dallas;
P. Michael Bolton, Q.C., for Gregory James Hinchcliffe;
Ken S. Westlake, for John Terezakis.
This application was heard before Curtis, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following oral decision on May 17, 2002.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451, R. v. Abreha, 2019 ONCA 392, R. v. Hersi, 2019 ONCA 94, R. v. Stinchcombe, 1994 ABCA 113, aff'd [1995] 1 S......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451, R. v. Abreha, 2019 ONCA 392, R. v. Hersi, 2019 ONCA 94, R. v. Stinchcombe, 1994 ABCA 113, aff'd [1995] 1 S......
-
R. v. Jageshur (R.), (2002) 165 O.A.C. 230 (CA)
...456 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47]. Gauthier v. Lac Brôme (Ville), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 3; 228 N.R. 5, refd to. [para. 50]. R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. Wool v. Canada, [1981] F.C.J. No. 506 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 54]. R. v. Sussex (Chief Constable); Ex parte Internation......
-
Ontario (Labour) v. Miller Group Inc.,
...Charter breach may be founded: see R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), at paras. 50-53; R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, at paras. The Correct Analytical Framework [43] Both courts below erred in their methodological approac......
-
R. v. Jageshur (R.), (2002) 165 O.A.C. 230 (CA)
...456 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47]. Gauthier v. Lac Brôme (Ville), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 3; 228 N.R. 5, refd to. [para. 50]. R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. Wool v. Canada, [1981] F.C.J. No. 506 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 54]. R. v. Sussex (Chief Constable); Ex parte Internation......
-
Ontario (Labour) v. Miller Group Inc.,
...Charter breach may be founded: see R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), at paras. 50-53; R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, at paras. The Correct Analytical Framework [43] Both courts below erred in their methodological approac......
-
R. v. Nuttall (J.S.) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2355
...lies told to the accused: Lewis v. United States (1966), 385 U.S. 206 at 5-6 (S.C.); Roy ; HMTQ v. Dallas, Hinchcliffe & Terezakis , 2002 BCSC 760 at paras. 18-20; and R. v. Felger , 2014 BCCA 34. Where the accused trust false friends to throw out the evidence, the Charter does not prot......
-
R. v. Roy,
...RCMP policy does not have the force of law, nor does it prescribe the scope of an officer’s duty (see, for example, R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, at paras. 103 and [44] Further, the possibility that an officer may have acted illegally in the co......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451, R. v. Abreha, 2019 ONCA 392, R. v. Hersi, 2019 ONCA 94, R. v. Stinchcombe, 1994 ABCA 113, aff'd [1995] 1 S......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 451, R. v. Abreha, 2019 ONCA 392, R. v. Hersi, 2019 ONCA 94, R. v. Stinchcombe, 1994 ABCA 113, aff'd [1995] 1 S......