R. v. Dean, 2017 ABPC 37

JudgeShynkar
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation2017 ABPC 37
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Date24 February 2017
Docket Number161093844P1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Search and Seizure
    • November 18, 2023
    ...General), [1993] 2 SCR 872 at 877. 219 R v Mok, 2015 ONCA 608; R v Alfreds, 2020 ABPC 32; R v Andre, 2018 ABPC 261; and R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37. 220 R v M(MR), [1998] 3 SCR 393 at paras 33–34 (airming an REP in pockets and recognizing a possible REP in lockers); AM, above note 113 (airming a......
  • R v Alfreds, 2020 ABPC 32
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 20, 2020
    ...2019 SKPC 7; R v Fletcher 2014 ONCJ 726; R v Clarke 2015 ONCJ 228; R v Bondy 2015 ONCJ 329; R v Teixeira 2012 CarswellOnt 17515; R v Dean 2017 ABPC 37; R v Andre 2018 ABPC 261; R v Krapchatova July 9, 2018 unreported, Creagh PCJ, Edmonton; R v Hare Oct 7, 2019 unreported, Higgerty PCJ, Ston......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Search and Seizure
    • November 18, 2023
    ...126 R v Daniels, 2015 ONSC 283 ........................................................................ 156–57 R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 ..................................................................................... 111 R v Debot, [1989] 2 SCR 1140, 102 NR 161 ................................
  • R v Marty, 2020 ABPC 167
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...a urinal in police custody much the same way they would in any public washroom has no application to female detainees” (see also R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 14). Further, Ms. Andre’s privacy interest was objectively reasonable. As stated by Justice Campbell in R v Singh, 2016 ONSC 1144 a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • R v Alfreds, 2020 ABPC 32
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 20, 2020
    ...2019 SKPC 7; R v Fletcher 2014 ONCJ 726; R v Clarke 2015 ONCJ 228; R v Bondy 2015 ONCJ 329; R v Teixeira 2012 CarswellOnt 17515; R v Dean 2017 ABPC 37; R v Andre 2018 ABPC 261; R v Krapchatova July 9, 2018 unreported, Creagh PCJ, Edmonton; R v Hare Oct 7, 2019 unreported, Higgerty PCJ, Ston......
  • R v Marty, 2020 ABPC 167
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...a urinal in police custody much the same way they would in any public washroom has no application to female detainees” (see also R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 14). Further, Ms. Andre’s privacy interest was objectively reasonable. As stated by Justice Campbell in R v Singh, 2016 ONSC 1144 a......
  • R v Andre, 2018 ABPC 261
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 9, 2018
    ...a urinal in police custody much the same way they would in any public washroom has no application to female detainees” (see also R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 14). [16] Further, Ms. Andre’s privacy interest was objectively reasonable. As stated by Justice Campbell in R v Singh, 2016 ONSC 1......
  • R v Brown, 2017 ABPC 235
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 12, 2017
    ...own safety when dealing with a person who was not known to him” (para 17). See also: R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169 at para 26 and R v Dean, 2017 ABPC 37 at para 26.[36] Defence counsel provided the Court with the decision of R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77, in support of his position. This case de......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT