R. v. Delacruz (R.), 2016 ABQB 187
| Judge | Ross, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 31, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2016 ABQB 187 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Cortes Rivera, 2017 ABQB 593
...of the accused and any other witness because the accused simply could not remember, credibility is not in issue. [66] In R v Delacruz, 2016 ABQB 187, [2016] AJ No 311 at paras 92-93, Ross J. cited Ewanchuk for the proposition that the accused’s observations and evidence are irrelevant on th......
-
R v Minns, 2018 ABQB 61
...Even where the accused does not testify, a court must be mindful of the principles reflected in the W(D) framework. [17] In R v Delacruz, 2016 ABQB 187, [2016] AJ No 311 at paras 92-93, Ross J. concluded, citing Ewanchuk, that the W(D) analysis has no application on the issue of whether or ......
2 cases
-
R v Cortes Rivera, 2017 ABQB 593
...of the accused and any other witness because the accused simply could not remember, credibility is not in issue. [66] In R v Delacruz, 2016 ABQB 187, [2016] AJ No 311 at paras 92-93, Ross J. cited Ewanchuk for the proposition that the accused’s observations and evidence are irrelevant on th......
-
R v Minns, 2018 ABQB 61
...Even where the accused does not testify, a court must be mindful of the principles reflected in the W(D) framework. [17] In R v Delacruz, 2016 ABQB 187, [2016] AJ No 311 at paras 92-93, Ross J. concluded, citing Ewanchuk, that the W(D) analysis has no application on the issue of whether or ......