R. v. Dillon (J.A.), [2005] O.T.C. 517 (SC)

JudgeHill, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJune 14, 2005
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2005] O.T.C. 517 (SC)

R. v. Dillon (J.A.), [2005] O.T.C. 517 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] O.T.C. TBEd. JN.114

Her Majesty the Queen v. Jamie Arnold Dillon

(Court File No. CRIMJ(P) 8056/05)

Indexed As: R. v. Dillon (J.A.)

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

Hill, J.

June 17, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Evidence - Topic 1687

Hearsay rule - Hearsay rule exceptions and exclusions - Official statements - Certificates - Notice of intention to offer - See paragraphs 1 to 16.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Bourque (1991), 106 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 288 A.P.R. 1; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 548 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

R. v. Bowles (1974), 16 C.C.C.(2d) 425 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Brebner (1989), 34 O.A.C. 278; 49 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Jahns (1986), 70 A.R. 247 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Bachman (W.M.) and Taarnes (B.L.) (1987), 78 A.R. 282 (C.A.), affd. [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1094; 86 N.R. 359; 89 A.R. 199 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Good, Schmidt and Winnipeg; R. v. Neubert (1983), 44 A.R. 393; 6 C.C.C.(3d) 105 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Gazica (A.W.) (2002), 317 A.R. 219; 284 W.A.C. 219; 168 C.C.C.(3d) 446 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Morrison (1982), 42 N.B.R.(2d) 271; 110 A.P.R. 271; 70 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. McCullagh (1990), 38 O.A.C. 54; 53 C.C.C.(3d) 130 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Tam, [2000] O.J. No. 2185 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Henri (1972), 9 C.C.C.(2d) 52 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Cordes (1978), 9 A.R. 58; 40 C.C.C.(2d) 442 (C.A.), affd. [1979] 1 S.C.R. 1062; 26 N.R. 612; 16 A.R. 162; 47 C.C.C.(2d) 46, refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Kwok (Y.L.D.) (2002), 168 B.C.A.C. 85; 275 W.A.C. 85; 164 C.C.C.(3d) 182 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Chang (P.Y.) (1996), 74 B.C.A.C. 13; 121 W.A.C. 13; 106 C.C.C.(3d) 87 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Norris (B.C.) (1993), 35 B.C.A.C. 133; 57 W.A.C. 133 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Wilson (E.D.) (1995), 169 A.R. 14; 97 W.A.C. 14 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

Counsel:

G. McGeachy, for the Crown;

P. Beard, for the defence.

This case was heard on June 14, 2005, by Hill, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on June 17, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT