R. v. Doak, 2022 NBCA 48

JurisdictionNew Brunswick
JudgeFrench,Green,Quigg
Citation2022 NBCA 48
Docket Number120-21-CA
CourtCourt of Appeal (New Brunswick)
Date25 August 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • HM the King v E.C.O.,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 29, 2023
    ...of Appeal in R v Allison, 2022 ONCA 329 at paras 39-44, 414 CCC (3d) 150 [ Allison] and the New Brunswick Court of Appeal in R v Doak, 2022 NBCA 48 at para 15, 417 CCC (3d) 530 [ Doak]. I quote from the R v C.B. ( supra) decision as follows starting at paragraph 5: Issue 1 — When doe......
  • R v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 27, 2023
    ...Luoma has not been followed. Judge Schreck’s reasoning has been rejected in several cases including R v Doak, 2022 NBCA 48, where the court noted at para 27 that Luoma “is patently inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s [14]        ......
2 cases
  • HM the King v E.C.O.,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 29, 2023
    ...of Appeal in R v Allison, 2022 ONCA 329 at paras 39-44, 414 CCC (3d) 150 [ Allison] and the New Brunswick Court of Appeal in R v Doak, 2022 NBCA 48 at para 15, 417 CCC (3d) 530 [ Doak]. I quote from the R v C.B. ( supra) decision as follows starting at paragraph 5: Issue 1 — When doe......
  • R v Johnson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 27, 2023
    ...Luoma has not been followed. Judge Schreck’s reasoning has been rejected in several cases including R v Doak, 2022 NBCA 48, where the court noted at para 27 that Luoma “is patently inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s [14]        ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT