R. v. Downey and Reynolds, (1992) 136 N.R. 266 (SCC)
Judge | Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | May 21, 1992 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1992), 136 N.R. 266 (SCC);72 CCC (3d) 1;1992 CanLII 109 (SCC);[1992] 2 SCR 10;[1992] SCJ No 48 (QL);JE 92-807;16 WCB (2d) 163;13 CR (4th) 129;2 Alta LR (3d) 193;125 AR 342;14 WAC 342;136 NR 266;9 CRR (2d) 1;90 DLR (4th) 449 |
R. v. Downey and Reynolds (1992), 136 N.R. 266 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Kenneth Dale Downey (appellant) v. Her Majesty The Queen (respondent) and The Attorney General of Canada and The Attorney General of Quebec (intervenors)
(21874)
Indexed As: R. v. Downey and Reynolds
Supreme Court of Canada
La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka,
Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and
Iacobucci, JJ.
May 21, 1992.
Summary:
Downey and Reynolds appealed their convictions for living on the avails of prostitution contrary to ss. 195(1)(b) and 195(1)(j) of the Criminal Code. The issue was whether s. 195(2), which provided that a person habitually living with a prostitute was, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, living on the avails of prostitution, violated the presumption of innocence under s. 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The Alberta Court of Appeal, in a judgment reported 105 A.R. 351, dismissed the appeal. The court held that s. 195(2) did not violate s. 11(d). Downey appealed.
The Supreme Court of Canada, La Forest, McLachlin and Iacobucci, JJ., dissenting, dismissed the appeal. The court held that s. 195(2) violated the presumption of innocence, but was a reasonable limit prescribed by law under s. 1 of the Charter.
Civil Rights - Topic 4945
Presumption of innocence - Evidence and proof - Reverse onus provisions - Section 195(2) of the Criminal Code provided that "evidence that a person lives with or is habitually in the company of prostitutes, or lives in a common bawdy house or house of assignment is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, proof that the person lives on the avails of prostitution" - The Supreme Court of Canada held that s. 195(2) infringed s. 11(d) of the Charter (presumption of innocence), because it permitted a conviction notwithstanding the existence of a reasonable doubt - The fact that someone lives with a prostitute did not lead inexorably to the conclusion that the person was living on the avails of prostitution - The court held that s. 195(2) was a reasonable limit prescribed by law under s. 1 of the Charter.
Civil Rights - Topic 4945
Presumption of innocence - Evidence and proof - Reverse onus provisions - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "[t]he presumption of innocence is infringed whenever the accused is liable to be convicted despite the existence of a reasonable doubt. If by the provisions of a statutory presumption, an accused is required to establish, that is to say to prove or disprove, on a balance of probabilities either an element of an offence or an excuse, then it contravenes s. 11(d). Such a provision would permit a conviction in spite of a reasonable doubt. Even if a rational connection exists between the established fact and the fact to be presumed, this would be insufficient to make valid a presumption requiring the accused to disprove an element of the offence" - See paragraph 30.
Civil Rights - Topic 4945
Presumption of innocence - Evidence and proof - Reverse onus provisions - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "[l]egislation which substitutes proof of one element for proof of an essential element will not infringe the presumption of innocence if as a result of the proof of the substituted element, it would be unreasonable for the trier of fact not to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the existence of the other element. To put it another way, the statutory presumption will be valid if the proof of the substituted fact leads inexorably to the proof of the other. However, the statutory presumption will infringe s. 11(d) if it requires the trier of fact to convict in spite of a reasonable doubt. A permissive assumption from which a trier of fact may but not must draw an inference of guilt will not infringe s. 11(d)" - See paragraph 30.
Civil Rights - Topic 8348
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Application - Exceptions - Reasonable limits prescribed by law - [See first Civil Rights - Topic 4945 ].
Criminal Law - Topic 770
Public morals - Living on the avails of prostitution - Evidence and proof - [See first Civil Rights - Topic 4945 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Appleby, [1972] S.C.R. 303, refd to. [para. 10].
R. v. Proudlock, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 525; 24 N.R. 199, refd to. [para. 12].
R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th) 200; 50 C.R.(3d) 1; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 19 C.R.R. 308, consd. [para. 15].
R. v. Dubois, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 350; 66 N.R. 289; 41 Man.R.(2d) 1; 25 C.C.C. (3d) 221, refd to. [para. 17].
R. v. Schuldt, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 592; 63 N.R. 241; 38 Man.R.(2d) 257, refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Vaillancourt, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 636; 81 N.R. 115; 10 Q.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 25].
R. v. Whyte, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 3; 86 N.R. 328; 64 C.R.(3d) 123, refd to. [para. 26].
R. v. Kowlyk, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 59; 86 N.R. 195; 55 Man.R.(2d) 1, refd to. [para. 28].
R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697; 117 N.R. 1; 114 A.R. 81, refd to. [para. 29].
R. v. Grilo (1991), 44 O.A.C. 284; 64 C.C.C.(3d) 53 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].
R. v. Celebrity Enterprises Ltd. (1977), 41 C.C.C.(2d) 540 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].
Shaw v. Director of Public Prosecutions (1961), 45 Cr. App. R. 113 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 37].
R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 94 N.R. 310; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Clarke, [1976] 2 All E.R. 696 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].
R. v. Boyle (1983), 5 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 63].
R. v. Oakes (1983), 40 O.R.(2d) 660 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 64].
County Court of Ulster County v. Allen (1979), 442 U.S. 140 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 68].
Statutes Noticed:
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 1 [para. 1]; sect. 11(d) [para. 14].
Criminal Code, S.C. 1892, c. 29, sect. 207 [para. 34].
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1927, c. 36, sect. 216(1)(i) [para. 36].
Criminal Code, S.C. 1953-54, c. 51, sect. 184 [para. 35].
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 195(1) [para. 33]; sect. 195(2) [para. 1]; sect. 306(2)(a) [para. 12].
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 212(1) [para. 33]; sect. 212(3) [para. 1]; sect. 348(2)(a) [para. 12].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Badgley Report - see Canada, Committee on Sexual Offences Against Children and Youths.
Canada, Committee on Sexual Offences Against Children and Youths, Sexual Offences Against Children (1984), vol. 2, pp. 1057-1058 [paras. 39, 47].
Canada, Special Committee on Pornography and Prostitution, Pornography and Prostitution in Canada (1985), vol. 2, pp. 379 [para. 38]; 417-418 [para. 43].
Cromwell, Thomas A., Proving Guilt: The Presumption of Innocence and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in Evidence and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1989), (W.H. Charles, T.A. Cromwell and K.B. Jobson, eds.), p. 130 ff. [para. 16].
Cross on Evidence (5th Ed. 1979), p. 122 ff. [para. 16].
Erbe, Nancy, Prostitutes: Victims of Men's Exploitation and Abuse (1984), 2 Law & Inequality 609, p. 613 [para. 41].
Fraser Report - see Canada, Special Committee on Pornography and Prostitution.
Milman, Barbara, New Rules of the Oldest Profession: Should We Change Our Prostitution Laws? (1980), 3 Harv. Women's L.J. 1, p. 33 [para. 41].
New South Wales, Report of the Select Committee of the Legislative Assembly Upon Prostitution (1986), pp. 26-48 [para. 42].
Rogan Committee Report - see New South Wales, Report of the Select Committee of the Legislative Assembly Upon Prostitution.
Sansfaçon, Daniel, Agreements and Conventions of the United Nations with Respect to Pornography and Prostitution (1984), generally [para. 44].
Sansfaçon, Daniel, Prostitution in Canada: A Research Review Report (1984), pp. 109-110 [para. 43].
Silbert, Mimi H., and Ayala M. Pines, Occupational Hazards of Street Prostitutes (1981), 8 Crim. Just. & Behaviour 395, p. 397 [para. 41].
United Kingdom, Criminal Law Revision Committee, Seventeenth Report, Prostitution: Off-street activities (1985), pp. 5-11 [para. 40]; 12 [paras. 40, 52]; 13 [para. 52].
United Kingdom, Criminal Law Revision Committee, Working Paper on Offences relating to Prostitution and allied Offences (1982), pp. 15 [para. 40]; 16 [paras. 40, 52]; 17-18 [para. 40].
Weisberg, D. Kelly, Children of the Night: The Adequacy of Statutory Treatment of Juvenile Prostitution (1984), 12 Am. J. Crim. Law 1, pp. 9 [para. 42]; 60 [para. 43].
Counsel:
Terence C. Semenuk and Mitchell C. Stephensen, for the appellant;
Jack Watson, for the respondent;
Robert J. Frater, for the Attorney General of Canada;
Monique Rousseau and Gilles Laporte, for the Attorney General of Quebec.
Solicitors of Record:
Singleton Urquhart Macdonald, Calgary, Alta., for the appellant;
Jack Watson, Edmonton, Alta., for the respondent;
John C. Tait, Q.C., Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, for the Attorney General of Canada;
Monique Rousseau and Gilles Laporte, Ste-Foy, Que., for the Attorney General of Quebec.
This appeal was heard on November 1, 1991, before La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered in both official languages on May 21, 1992, and the following opinions were filed:
Cory, J. (L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka and Gonthier, JJ., concurring) - see paragraphs 1 to 55;
La Forest, J., dissenting - see paragraphs 56 to 58;
McLachlin, J., dissenting (Iacobucci, J., concurring) - see paragraphs 59 to 80.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Laba, [1994] 3 SCR 965
...[1993] 4 S.C.R. 475; R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; Schachter v. Canada, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Albashir,
...190; R. v. Bain, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 91; Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 4, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 13; referred to: R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; R. v. Li, 2020 SCC 12; R. v. Magoon, 2018 SCC 14, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 309; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; Doucet‑Boud......
-
CFS v. Jordan,
...87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th) 200; 50 C.R.(3d) 1; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 19 C.R.R. 308, refd to. [para. 98]. R. v. Downey and Reynolds, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; 136 N.R. 266; 125 A.R. 342; 14 W.A.C. 342, refd to. [para. 99]. R. v. Butler and McCord, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452; 134 N.R. 81; 78 Man.R.(2d......
-
R. v. Noble (S.J.), (1997) 210 N.R. 321 (SCC)
...5 W.W.R. 26; 42 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 29 B.C.L.R.(2d) 273; 51 D.L.R.(4th) 481; 35 C.R.R. 1, refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Downey and Reynolds, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; 136 N.R. 266; 125 A.R. 342; 14 W.A.C. 342, refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th......
-
R. v. Laba, [1994] 3 SCR 965
...[1993] 4 S.C.R. 475; R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; Schachter v. Canada, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Albashir,
...190; R. v. Bain, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 91; Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 4, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 13; referred to: R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; R. v. Li, 2020 SCC 12; R. v. Magoon, 2018 SCC 14, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 309; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; Doucet‑Boud......
-
CFS v. Jordan,
...87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th) 200; 50 C.R.(3d) 1; 24 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 19 C.R.R. 308, refd to. [para. 98]. R. v. Downey and Reynolds, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; 136 N.R. 266; 125 A.R. 342; 14 W.A.C. 342, refd to. [para. 99]. R. v. Butler and McCord, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452; 134 N.R. 81; 78 Man.R.(2d......
-
R. v. Noble (S.J.), (1997) 210 N.R. 321 (SCC)
...5 W.W.R. 26; 42 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 29 B.C.L.R.(2d) 273; 51 D.L.R.(4th) 481; 35 C.R.R. 1, refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Downey and Reynolds, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10; 136 N.R. 266; 125 A.R. 342; 14 W.A.C. 342, refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 O.A.C. 335; 26 D.L.R.(4th......
-
The Purpose, Nature And Constitutionality Of The Presumptions Of Section 69 Of The Competition Act
...Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [the Charter]. 7 Competition Act, supra note 3, s 69(1). 8 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 1992 CanLII 109, 1992 CarswellAlta 56 at p 29 9 Durward, supra note 4 at para 54. 10 Ibid at paras 58-73. 11 [1986] 1 SCR 103, 1986 CanLII 46......
-
Table of cases
...118, 220 R v Douglas, [1991] 1 SCR 301, 63 CCC (3d) 29, 3 CR (4th) 246...................... 162 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 13 CR (4th) 129, 72 CCC (3d) 1 ........... 63–64, 267 R v Downey, 2017 ONCA 789 ............................................................................. 225 R v......
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...(4th) 200, also discussed at length in Chapter 4. 172 Ibid at para 29. 173 R v Whyte, [1988] 2 SCR 3, 51 DLR (4th) 481. 174 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 90 DLR (4th) 449. 175 R v Keegstra, [1990] 3 SCR 697, 61 CCC (3d) THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 348 freedom of expression. As Dickson......
-
Table of Cases
...156 R v Dow, 2010 QCCS 4276 ...................................................................................301 R v Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10, 13 CR (4th) 129, 72 CCC (3d) 1 ........... 61–62, 255 R v Downey, 2017 ONCA 789 .........................................................................
-
Table of Cases
...leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (1970), 1 C.C.C. (2d) 68n (S.C.C.)............................................. 73 R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 10.................................................................................................... 235 R. v. E.A.L., [1998] O.J. No. 4160, 1......