R. v. Drysdale (J.J.), 2016 SKQB 160

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeZarzeczny, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE
Date09 May 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Courtoreille,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...Crown counsel on appeal reiterated the position of trial Crown that the trial judge should have given greater weight to [R v Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160] and his failure to do so is an error in principle justifying appellate intervention. But, as Caldwell J.A. observed in Whitehead, to the exte......
  • R. v. Clarke, 2018 NLPC 0818A00040
    • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Court (Canada)
    • June 19, 2018
    ...that the accused did not act in self-defence. See R. v. Mateo-Asencio, 2018 CarswellOnt 215 (ONT. S.C.J.) at para 86, and R. v. Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160 (Sask. Q.B.) at para 34. [56]       The Crown has not persuaded me that some use of force to get Beck away fr......
  • R. v. GRAHAM, 2018 SKQB 3
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 8, 2018
    ...… [81] The burden is on the Crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt self-defence is not applicable to the matter at hand (R v Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160 at para [82] The court finds the Crown has proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, self-defence does not apply in this matter. Mr. Graham did not......
  • R. v. Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 312
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 21, 2016
    ...the court September 2, 2016 (R v Gladue, [1999] 1 SCR 688 ). THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES [5] The court’s trial judgment of May 9, 2016 [2016 SKQB 160] sets out, in detail, the facts and circumstances surrounding the offence with which Mr. Drysdale was charged and in respect of which I foun......
4 cases
  • R v Courtoreille,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...Crown counsel on appeal reiterated the position of trial Crown that the trial judge should have given greater weight to [R v Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160] and his failure to do so is an error in principle justifying appellate intervention. But, as Caldwell J.A. observed in Whitehead, to the exte......
  • R. v. Clarke, 2018 NLPC 0818A00040
    • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Court (Canada)
    • June 19, 2018
    ...that the accused did not act in self-defence. See R. v. Mateo-Asencio, 2018 CarswellOnt 215 (ONT. S.C.J.) at para 86, and R. v. Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160 (Sask. Q.B.) at para 34. [56]       The Crown has not persuaded me that some use of force to get Beck away fr......
  • R. v. GRAHAM, 2018 SKQB 3
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 8, 2018
    ...… [81] The burden is on the Crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt self-defence is not applicable to the matter at hand (R v Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 160 at para [82] The court finds the Crown has proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, self-defence does not apply in this matter. Mr. Graham did not......
  • R. v. Drysdale, 2016 SKQB 312
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 21, 2016
    ...the court September 2, 2016 (R v Gladue, [1999] 1 SCR 688 ). THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES [5] The court’s trial judgment of May 9, 2016 [2016 SKQB 160] sets out, in detail, the facts and circumstances surrounding the offence with which Mr. Drysdale was charged and in respect of which I foun......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT