R. v. Eccles (D.J.), 2004 BCSC 1281
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | September 28, 2004 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2004 BCSC 1281;[2004] B.C.T.C. 1281 (SC) |
R. v. Eccles (D.J.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 1281 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. NO.020
Regina (respondent) v. Darian James Eccles (appellant)
(X065539; 2004 BCSC 1281)
Indexed As: R. v. Eccles (D.J.)
British Columbia Supreme Court
New Westminster
Romilly, J.
October 4, 2004.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 5250.1
Evidence and witnesses - Identification - Dock identification - See paragraphs 1 to 63.
Criminal Law - Topic 5253
Evidence and witnesses - Identification - Proof of - See paragraphs 1 to 63.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. R.W.B. (2003), 174 O.A.C. 198 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Biniaris (J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; 252 N.R. 204; 134 B.C.A.C. 161; 219 W.A.C. 161; 143 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 15].
R. v. A.G., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 439; 252 N.R. 272; 132 O.A.C. 1; 32 C.R.(5th) 45; 143 C.C.C.(3d) 46, refd to. [para. 16].
R. v. Burns (R.H.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; 165 N.R. 374; 42 B.C.A.C. 161; 67 W.A.C. 161; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 29 C.R.(4th) 113, refd to. [para. 16].
R. v. Burke (J.) (No. 3), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474; 194 N.R. 247; 139 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 147; 433 A.P.R. 147; 46 C.R.(4th) 195; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 205, refd to. [para. 16].
R. v. Kwok (Y.L.D.) (2002), 168 B.C.A.C. 85; 275 W.A.C. 85; 2002 BCCA 177, refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. Reischer (M.M.) (2004), 192 B.C.A.C. 303; 315 W.A.C. 303; 2004 BCCA 49, refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. S.G.F., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 416; 287 N.R. 338; 166 B.C.A.C. 55; 271 W.A.C. 55; 2002 SCC 37, affing. (2001), 153 B.C.A.C. 86; 251 W.A.C. 86; 2001 BCCA 320, refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. Lewis (G.), [2003] O.A.C. Uned. 419 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. R.W., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122; 137 N.R. 214; 54 O.A.C. 164; 74 C.C.C.(3d) 134, refd to. [para. 23].
R. v. Grosse (P.) (1996), 91 O.A.C. 40; 107 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23].
R. v. Hay (1990), 25 M.V.R.(2d) 121 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].
R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 2; 40 N.R. 255; 133 D.L.R.(3d) 546; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193, refd to. [para. 24].
R. v. Sall (1990), 81 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 10; 255 A.P.R. 10; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 48 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].
R. v. Nickerson (W.S.) (1999), 178 N.S.R.(2d) 189; 549 A.P.R. 189 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26].
R. v. Corbett (1973), 1 N.R. 258; 14 C.C.C.(2d) 385 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 27].
R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; 78 N.R. 351; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 27].
R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161; 97 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28].
R. v. R.M.M. (1998), 106 O.A.C. 191; 122 C.C.C.(3d) 563 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].
R. v. Clayton (J.R.), [1998] B.C.A.C. Uned. 126 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36].
R. v. Manj, [1995] B.C.J. No. 1059 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36].
R. v. F.G.N. (1998), 112 B.C.A.C. 148; 182 W.A.C. 148 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36].
People v. Casey (No. 2), [1963] I.R. 33, refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Sutton, [1970] 3 C.C.C. 152 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Howarth (1970), 1 C.C.C.(2d) 546 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Virk (1983), 33 C.R.(3d) 378 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Hang (1990), 55 C.C.C.(3d) 195; 9 W.C.B.(2d) 560 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Reitsma (S.J.) (1997), 97 B.C.A.C. 303; 157 W.A.C. 303; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 1 (C.A.), affd. (1998), 226 N.R. 367; 107 B.C.A.C. 161; 174 W.A.C. 161; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 17 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Fengstad (E.J.) et al. (1994), 40 B.C.A.C. 39; 65 W.A.C. 39; 27 C.R.(4th) 383 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Tam (R.K.N.) et al. (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 40; 100 W.A.C. 40; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 196 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Field (M.W.) (1999), 126 B.C.A.C. 103; 206 W.A.C. 103 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].
R. v. Bullock (R.) (1999), 104 O.T.C. 245 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 40].
R. v. Nikolovski (A.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1197; 204 N.R. 333; 96 O.A.C. 1; 111 C.C.C.(3d) 403, refd to. [para. 41].
R. v. Mezzo, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802; 68 N.R. 1; 43 Man.R.(2d) 161; 27 C.C.C.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 42].
R. v. Pelletier (A.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 601; 203 N.R. 241, affing. (1995), 203 N.R. 242 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].
R. v. Carpenter, [1998] O.J. No. 1819 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].
R. v. Hill (J.G.), [1997] O.A.C. Uned. 394 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Grangello (R.), [1999] O.A.C. Uned. 174 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Izzard (1990), 38 O.A.C. 6; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 252 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Mooney (D.) (1999), 123 O.A.C. 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Myers (D.), [1997] O.A.C. Uned. 490 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Atfield (1983), 42 A.R. 294; 25 Alta. L.R.(2d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].
R. v. Long, [1973] Crim. L.R. 577 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Keshane (1992), 11 B.C.A.C. 86; 22 W.A.C. 86 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Fouts (1991), 3 C.R.(4th) 324 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. McDonald (1951), 101 C.C.C. 78 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Mongovius, [1982] B.C.J. No. 1101 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Quercia (1990), 41 O.A.C. 305; 75 O.R.(2d) 463 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Williams, [1991] B.C.J. No. 599 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Bardales (R.A.) (1995), 65 B.C.A.C. 241; 106 W.A.C. 241; 101 C.C.C.(3d) 289 (C.A.), affd. (1996), 198 N.R. 235; 78 B.C.A.C. 161; 128 W.A.C. 161; 107 C.C.C.(3d) 194 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Izzard (1990), 38 O.A.C. 6; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 252 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Nicholson (1984), 52 A.R. 132; 12 C.C.C.(3d) 228 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Williams (1982), 66 C.C.C.(2d) 234 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Yuan (1992), 17 W.C.B. 194 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Amaral, [1990] O.J. No. 1762 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Hibbert (K.R.) (2002), 287 N.R. 111; 165 B.C.A.C. 161; 270 W.A.C. 161; 163 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Smierciak (1946), 87 C.C.C. 175 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
R. v. Miaponoose (A.) (1996), 93 O.A.C. 115; 30 O.R.(3d) 419; 110 C.C.C.(3d) 445 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
R. v. Nguyen (S.H.) (2000), 132 O.A.C. 354; 35 C.R.(5th) 245 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
R. v. Gordon (A.), [2002] O.T.C. 375 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 50].
R. v. J.R.L. (1994), 51 B.C.A.C. 161; 84 W.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61].
R. v. Levy (1991), 44 O.A.C. 5; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 62].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Cory, Peter D., The Inquiry Regarding Thomas Sophonow - The Investigation, Prosecution and Consideration of Entitlement to Compensation (2001), generally [para. 38].
Counsel:
M. Dattilo, for the respondent;
D. Albert, for the appellant.
This appeal was heard on September 28, 2004, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on October 4, 2004.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Burgar (K.P.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1709 (SC)
...[para. 16]. R. v. Keshane (1992), 11 B.C.A.C. 86; 22 W.A.C. 86 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Eccles (D.J.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 1281; 2004 BCSC 1281, refd to. [para. United States of America v. Akrami et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 165; 2001 BCSC 165, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. Askov, Hussey, Mel......
-
R. v. Stjepanovic (D.S.), (2006) 223 B.C.A.C. 226 (CA)
...and medical evidence - DNA evidence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5241 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Eccles (D.J.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 1281; 2004 BCSC 1281, refd to. [para. R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; 78 N.R. 351; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Biniaris (J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; ......
-
R. v. Burgar (K.P.), 2014 BCSC 331
...despite all potential frailties, a trier of fact may be justified in convicting on the evidence of a single eyewitness: R. v. Eccles , 2004 BCSC 1281 at para. 43. 8. The appellant says that Judge Hicks should not have imposed sentence because the plea was qualified. [62] When Mr. Burgar cam......
-
R. v. Stump (S.L.J.) et al., 2014 BCSC 2644
...are the classic problems of identification based on a fleeting glance and are discussed in the decision, for example, of R. v. Eccles, 2004 BCSC 1281. I should say that the events in Mr. David's apartment happened very quickly. They were very intense, and people were fighting intensely......
-
R. v. Burgar (K.P.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1709 (SC)
...[para. 16]. R. v. Keshane (1992), 11 B.C.A.C. 86; 22 W.A.C. 86 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Eccles (D.J.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 1281; 2004 BCSC 1281, refd to. [para. United States of America v. Akrami et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 165; 2001 BCSC 165, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. Askov, Hussey, Mel......
-
R. v. Stjepanovic (D.S.), (2006) 223 B.C.A.C. 226 (CA)
...and medical evidence - DNA evidence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5241 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Eccles (D.J.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 1281; 2004 BCSC 1281, refd to. [para. R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; 78 N.R. 351; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 417, refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Biniaris (J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; ......
-
R. v. Burgar (K.P.), 2014 BCSC 331
...despite all potential frailties, a trier of fact may be justified in convicting on the evidence of a single eyewitness: R. v. Eccles , 2004 BCSC 1281 at para. 43. 8. The appellant says that Judge Hicks should not have imposed sentence because the plea was qualified. [62] When Mr. Burgar cam......
-
R. v. Stump (S.L.J.) et al., 2014 BCSC 2644
...are the classic problems of identification based on a fleeting glance and are discussed in the decision, for example, of R. v. Eccles, 2004 BCSC 1281. I should say that the events in Mr. David's apartment happened very quickly. They were very intense, and people were fighting intensely......