R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. Kraus |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 639 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 639 |
| Date | 13 August 2021 |
| Docket Number | 181399122Q1 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Kemp
...mind the principle of parity and have regard to the cases which have a longer sentence and cases which have a shorter sentence. R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639 [ EF] at para 84. 59 The Court must bear in mind the principle of parity and have regard to cases where longer and shorter sentences were imp......
-
R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
...established. The Position of the Defence [49]        Relying on the decision of Kraus J. in R v E.F., 2021 ABQB 639, and the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Exell, 2015 ONCA 704, the Defence urges the Court to impose a global sentence of 4 y......
-
R v Gladue
...of parity is not absolute and should not undermine the principle of individualized sentencing. Kraus J articulated this in R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639, at para 84: The principle of parity is not absolute and cannot divert attention from the governing principles, such as the nature and seriousness......
-
R v Artar
...in tension; rather, parity is an expression of proportionality… In practice, parity gives meaning to proportionality.” 14 In R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639, the court also stated at para 84: [84] The principle of parity is not absolute and cannot divert attention from the governing principles, such ......
4 cases
-
R v Kemp
...mind the principle of parity and have regard to the cases which have a longer sentence and cases which have a shorter sentence. R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639 [ EF] at para 84. 59 The Court must bear in mind the principle of parity and have regard to cases where longer and shorter sentences were imp......
-
R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
...established. The Position of the Defence [49]        Relying on the decision of Kraus J. in R v E.F., 2021 ABQB 639, and the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Exell, 2015 ONCA 704, the Defence urges the Court to impose a global sentence of 4 y......
-
R v Gladue
...of parity is not absolute and should not undermine the principle of individualized sentencing. Kraus J articulated this in R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639, at para 84: The principle of parity is not absolute and cannot divert attention from the governing principles, such as the nature and seriousness......
-
R v Artar
...in tension; rather, parity is an expression of proportionality… In practice, parity gives meaning to proportionality.” 14 In R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639, the court also stated at para 84: [84] The principle of parity is not absolute and cannot divert attention from the governing principles, such ......