R v EF,

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice M. Kraus
Neutral Citation2021 ABQB 639
Citation2021 ABQB 639
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number181399122Q1
Date13 August 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 16, 2021
    ...established. The Position of the Defence [49]        Relying on the decision of Kraus J. in R v E.F., 2021 ABQB 639, and the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Exell, 2015 ONCA 704, the Defence urges the Court to impose a global sentence of 4 y......
2 cases
  • R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 16, 2021
    ...established. The Position of the Defence [49]        Relying on the decision of Kraus J. in R v E.F., 2021 ABQB 639, and the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Exell, 2015 ONCA 704, the Defence urges the Court to impose a global sentence of 4 y......
  • R v Gladue,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 28, 2023
    ...of parity is not absolute and should not undermine the principle of individualized sentencing. Kraus J articulated this in R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639, at para 84: The principle of parity is not absolute and cannot divert attention from the governing principles, such as the nature and seriousness......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT