R. v. Ellis,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | DeWitt-Van Oosten,Groberman,Marchand |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 278 |
| Docket Number | CA47971 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 16 August 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
T.L. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...to work. [Italics in the original; emphasis added.] See also R. v. McGregor, 2023 SCC 4 at paras. 106–109; R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at paras. 59–60; and J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2016 BCCA 124 at [97] &......
-
R v Armstrong,
...The issue is whether the sentence is proportionate to the offence committed and the moral blameworthiness of the offender: R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at paras. 117–119; Parranto at para. 32 As noted, the judge considered all of the relevant circumstances, including mitigating and agg......
-
R v Desmond,
...Parranto at para. 40. 11 A range of sentences reflects the objective seriousness of the crime, not the type of offender: R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at para. 128. A range is a guideline only, and not a hard and fast rule: Parranto at para. 12 Considering the gravity of the offence itself, it......
-
2023 BCSC 85,
...a decision in R. v. Smith, 2017 BCCA 112. This, as I will return to, was more recently considered again and confirmed in R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278. Smith sets out a proposed range of sentencing for what is described as “street level” trafficking in fentanyl, which begins at 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
T.L. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...to work. [Italics in the original; emphasis added.] See also R. v. McGregor, 2023 SCC 4 at paras. 106–109; R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at paras. 59–60; and J.P. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2016 BCCA 124 at [97] &......
-
R v Armstrong,
...The issue is whether the sentence is proportionate to the offence committed and the moral blameworthiness of the offender: R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at paras. 117–119; Parranto at para. 32 As noted, the judge considered all of the relevant circumstances, including mitigating and agg......
-
R v Desmond,
...Parranto at para. 40. 11 A range of sentences reflects the objective seriousness of the crime, not the type of offender: R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278 at para. 128. A range is a guideline only, and not a hard and fast rule: Parranto at para. 12 Considering the gravity of the offence itself, it......
-
2023 BCSC 85,
...a decision in R. v. Smith, 2017 BCCA 112. This, as I will return to, was more recently considered again and confirmed in R. v. Ellis, 2022 BCCA 278. Smith sets out a proposed range of sentencing for what is described as “street level” trafficking in fentanyl, which begins at 1......
Request a trial to view additional results