R. v. F.I.
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | TOCHOR J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKQB 264 |
| Citation | 2021 SKQB 264 |
| Docket Number | CRM 395 of 2019 |
| Date | 08 October 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
R. v. D.E.
...CCC (3d) 4. In this Court, the relevant line of cases continues with R v J.D.H., 2022 SKQB 6; R v Bear‑Knight, 2021 SKQB 308; R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.]; R v Al‑Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th)......
-
R v Sium
...into evidence as Exhibit D-1 and constitute an admission to her allegation of sexual assault. The reasoning and conclusion in [R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264] applies equally to Exhibit D-1. [46] The conversation from Exhibit D-1 is reproduced below: [Complainant]: I just want you to admit that yo......
-
R. v. Papequash
...of fact to assess the witness’ credibility or the reliability of the witness’ in-Court testimony (Bear at para 11). [26] In R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 at paras 48-56, Tochor J., as he then was, held that text messages were admissible to assist the trier of fact in assessing a witness’ credibil......
-
R. v. RIVER BEAR-KNIGHT
...55; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Al-Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.] and R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]. Later in this analysis, I will speak to how this framework applies to this [88] The judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Ryon......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R. v. D.E.
...CCC (3d) 4. In this Court, the relevant line of cases continues with R v J.D.H., 2022 SKQB 6; R v Bear‑Knight, 2021 SKQB 308; R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.]; R v Al‑Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155, 64 MVR (7th)......
-
R v Sium
...into evidence as Exhibit D-1 and constitute an admission to her allegation of sexual assault. The reasoning and conclusion in [R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264] applies equally to Exhibit D-1. [46] The conversation from Exhibit D-1 is reproduced below: [Complainant]: I just want you to admit that yo......
-
R. v. Papequash
...of fact to assess the witness’ credibility or the reliability of the witness’ in-Court testimony (Bear at para 11). [26] In R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 at paras 48-56, Tochor J., as he then was, held that text messages were admissible to assist the trier of fact in assessing a witness’ credibil......
-
R. v. RIVER BEAR-KNIGHT
...55; R v Douglas, 2020 SKQB 155; R v C.J., 2020 SKQB 318; R v Al-Zawahreh, 2021 SKQB 230; R v D.M.V., 2021 SKQB 237 [D.M.V.] and R v F.I., 2021 SKQB 264 [F.I.]. Later in this analysis, I will speak to how this framework applies to this [88] The judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Ryon......
Get Started for Free
