R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Michel A. Monnin,Madam Justice Holly C. Beard,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
| Date | 26 July 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AR17-30-08930 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
R v Osman,
...(3d) 357. [28] It is not for an appellate court to substitute other reasonable inferences for those found by the trial judge: R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, paras 21-33, 365 CCC (3d) 20, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, [2019] 1 SCR 97; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, para 166, [2019] 1 WWR 612; Cabrera, paras 166-16......
-
R v Perswain,
...v McIvor, 2021 MBCA 55 at paras 33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC [10] The accused argues that the unreasonable verdict is the result of erroneous factual findings and/or factual......
-
R v Sutherland,
...With respect to the second ground of appeal, this Court, in R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, when addressing the admissibility of lay opinion evidence, stated that, “[a]s a question of law, a decision on the admission of evidence is reviewed on the standar......
-
R v TS,
...own list of reasonable inferences and substitute them for the reasonable inferences implicitly found by the trier of fact: see R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74. And for good reason. To allow such substitution would be, in effect, to allow an appellate court to re-try the case, something this Court ......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
-
R v Osman,
...(3d) 357. [28] It is not for an appellate court to substitute other reasonable inferences for those found by the trial judge: R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, paras 21-33, 365 CCC (3d) 20, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, [2019] 1 SCR 97; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, para 166, [2019] 1 WWR 612; Cabrera, paras 166-16......
-
R v Perswain,
...v McIvor, 2021 MBCA 55 at paras 33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC [10] The accused argues that the unreasonable verdict is the result of erroneous factual findings and/or factual......
-
R v Sutherland,
...With respect to the second ground of appeal, this Court, in R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, when addressing the admissibility of lay opinion evidence, stated that, “[a]s a question of law, a decision on the admission of evidence is reviewed on the standar......
-
R v TS,
...own list of reasonable inferences and substitute them for the reasonable inferences implicitly found by the trier of fact: see R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74. And for good reason. To allow such substitution would be, in effect, to allow an appellate court to re-try the case, something this Court ......
Request a trial to view additional results