R. v. Fox,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice H. Holmes
Citation2017 BCSC 2361
Docket Number27178
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date10 November 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • R. v. Miller,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2022
    ...The Crown and amicus referred to a number of decisions during their submissions including R. v. Cholin, 2011 BCCA 116; R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361; and R. v. McConnell, 2014 BCSC 1743, all of which I found helpful. In McConnell, the offender's mental illness was a mitigating factor which......
  • R v Wowk, 2019 ABQB 959
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Diciembre 2019
    ...where a repeat offender received a two year sentence plus probation in circumstances which are of marginal assistance here; h. R v Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361 where the offender targeted a former spouse to undermine her relationship with family, friends, employers and colleagues as well as financia......
  • R v Fox,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 9 Noviembre 2018
    ...Court of British Columbia, dated June 20, 2017 (conviction) and November 10, 2017 (sentence) (R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2665 (conviction) and 2017 BCSC 2361 (sentence), Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (appointed for limited s. 684): T.B. Magder The Appellant,......
  • R. v. Graf,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2020
    ...imposed, including threats of violence and stalking, for example, are not present here: Myers; Settle; Kapoor; Bates; Taylor; R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361; R. v. Lynch, 2017 BCPC 172; R. v. Fader, 2014 BCPC 327; R. v. Cooper, 2009 BCCA 208; R. v. J.R.I., 2002 BCPC 711; R. v. Khemhus, [1994] B.......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • R v Wowk, 2019 ABQB 959
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Diciembre 2019
    ...where a repeat offender received a two year sentence plus probation in circumstances which are of marginal assistance here; h. R v Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361 where the offender targeted a former spouse to undermine her relationship with family, friends, employers and colleagues as well as financia......
  • R. v. Miller,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2022
    ...The Crown and amicus referred to a number of decisions during their submissions including R. v. Cholin, 2011 BCCA 116; R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361; and R. v. McConnell, 2014 BCSC 1743, all of which I found helpful. In McConnell, the offender's mental illness was a mitigating factor which......
  • R v Fox,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 9 Noviembre 2018
    ...Court of British Columbia, dated June 20, 2017 (conviction) and November 10, 2017 (sentence) (R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2665 (conviction) and 2017 BCSC 2361 (sentence), Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant (appointed for limited s. 684): T.B. Magder The Appellant,......
  • R. v. Graf,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Octubre 2020
    ...imposed, including threats of violence and stalking, for example, are not present here: Myers; Settle; Kapoor; Bates; Taylor; R. v. Fox, 2017 BCSC 2361; R. v. Lynch, 2017 BCPC 172; R. v. Fader, 2014 BCPC 327; R. v. Cooper, 2009 BCCA 208; R. v. J.R.I., 2002 BCPC 711; R. v. Khemhus, [1994] B.......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • British Columbia Legislation Targeting Revenge Porn Comes Into Effect
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 6 Marzo 2024
    ...5. Stacey Janzer, "More intimate photos shared without consent in P.E.I. than any other province: Stats Can" (31 July 2023), online . 6. 2017 BCSC 2361. 7. Natasha Chettiar, "Revenge Porn - don't press the send button! Your Options for Responding to Non-Consensual Image Sharing" (2018), onl......