R. v. Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Ronald Berger,The Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham,The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall |
| Citation | 2017 ABCA 194 |
| Docket Number | 1301-0290-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 21 June 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
R. v. Parranto,
...1168, [2009] R.J.Q. 1675; R. v. Sandercock (1985), 22 C.C.C. (3d) 79; R. v. Lee, 2012 ABCA 17, 58 Alta. L.R. (5th) 30; R. v. Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194, 53 Alta. L.R. (6th) 11; R. v. D.S.C., 2018 ABCA 335, [2019] 3 W.W.R. 259; R. v. Lafrance (1993), 59 Q.A.C. 213; R. v. Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222,......
-
THE SUPER PANEL DOCTRINE.
...two modes. See Chauvet, supra note 95; R v Jefferson, 2008 ABCA 365; R v A(JLM), 2009 ABCA 295; Arcand, supra note 78; R v Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194. The debate was apparently settled with all decisions of the Court having equal precedential value. See Rv Lee, 2012 ABCA 17. The Court of App......
-
R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295
...involving serious sexual offences against minors (R. v. Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222, but see also the more recent case of R. v. Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194; R. v. Norton, 2016 MBCA 79) but courts in this province have not followed this practice. The cases cited to me by counsel show a range of sente......
-
R v EJB, 2017 ABQB 726
...range so long as it accords with the principles and objectives of sentencing. The recent controversy caused by R v Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194, highlights the potential disproportionality created when imposing broadly applicable starting point sentences on first time offenders whose offences ......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
R. v. Parranto,
...1168, [2009] R.J.Q. 1675; R. v. Sandercock (1985), 22 C.C.C. (3d) 79; R. v. Lee, 2012 ABCA 17, 58 Alta. L.R. (5th) 30; R. v. Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194, 53 Alta. L.R. (6th) 11; R. v. D.S.C., 2018 ABCA 335, [2019] 3 W.W.R. 259; R. v. Lafrance (1993), 59 Q.A.C. 213; R. v. Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222,......
-
R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295
...involving serious sexual offences against minors (R. v. Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222, but see also the more recent case of R. v. Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194; R. v. Norton, 2016 MBCA 79) but courts in this province have not followed this practice. The cases cited to me by counsel show a range of sente......
-
R v EJB, 2017 ABQB 726
...range so long as it accords with the principles and objectives of sentencing. The recent controversy caused by R v Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194, highlights the potential disproportionality created when imposing broadly applicable starting point sentences on first time offenders whose offences ......
-
R v DSC, 2018 ABCA 335
...Before leaving the topic of major sexual interference, we note that the respondent suggests that the divided decision in R v Gashkanyi, 2017 ABCA 194, 351 CCC (3d) 532 has effectively removed the guiding authority of Hajar. This topic is covered under the heading “Unfitness of the Sentence”......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE SUPER PANEL DOCTRINE.
...two modes. See Chauvet, supra note 95; R v Jefferson, 2008 ABCA 365; R v A(JLM), 2009 ABCA 295; Arcand, supra note 78; R v Gashikanyi, 2017 ABCA 194. The debate was apparently settled with all decisions of the Court having equal precedential value. See Rv Lee, 2012 ABCA 17. The Court of App......