R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeM.A. CODE J.
Citation2020 ONSC 4071
Date30 June 2020
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberCR-20-00000169/000R
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Burke, 2020 ONSC 4453
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 Julio 2020
    ...change of circumstance” on the basis of “new evidence”.  In my recent Reasons for Judgement in R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. 20-24, I set out my understanding of that standard of review, as explained in R. v. St. Cloud (2015), 321 C.C.C. (3d) 307 at paras.......
  • R. v. Mahoney, 2021 ONSC 1459
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2021
    ...in circumstance”, as that legal test is explained in R. v. St. Cloud (2015), 321 C.C.C. (3d) 307 (S.C.C.) and in R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. [31]    The primary grounds for detention are not in issue in this case, given the Applicant’s strong connecti......
  • R. v. Kieley, 2020 ONSC 4593
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2020
    ...trial in Newmarket and his preliminary inquiry in Toronto.  I agree with this concession.  See:  R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. 20-24 where the post-St. Cloud meaning of “material change in circumstance” is [15]       &......
  • R. v. Stanley, 2020 ONSC 8065
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2020
    ...hearing de novo after admitting the “new evidence”. See:  R. v. J.A., 2020 ONCA 660 at paras. 26 and 55; R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. [8]       Applying the above threshold approach to the admissibility of “new evidenceȁ......
4 cases
  • R. v. Burke, 2020 ONSC 4453
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 Julio 2020
    ...change of circumstance” on the basis of “new evidence”.  In my recent Reasons for Judgement in R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. 20-24, I set out my understanding of that standard of review, as explained in R. v. St. Cloud (2015), 321 C.C.C. (3d) 307 at paras.......
  • R. v. Mahoney,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2021
    ...in circumstance”, as that legal test is explained in R. v. St. Cloud (2015), 321 C.C.C. (3d) 307 (S.C.C.) and in R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. [31]    The primary grounds for detention are not in issue in this case, given the Applicant’s strong connecti......
  • R. v. Kieley, 2020 ONSC 4593
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 28 Julio 2020
    ...trial in Newmarket and his preliminary inquiry in Toronto.  I agree with this concession.  See:  R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. 20-24 where the post-St. Cloud meaning of “material change in circumstance” is [15]       &......
  • R. v. Stanley,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2020
    ...hearing de novo after admitting the “new evidence”. See:  R. v. J.A., 2020 ONCA 660 at paras. 26 and 55; R. v. Gordon, 2020 ONSC 4071 at paras. [8]       Applying the above threshold approach to the admissibility of “new evidenceȁ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT